First, if we wanted to compete, REALLY wanted to compete, we would have made the trade the Blue Jays made with the Marlins. It would have filled most of our needs and we had the prospects to get Miami to trade with us. The scary thing is not the risk of making the trade but the potentially moronic things we will do this off-season trying to bottom feed to compete when our problems need much more than bottom feeding to fix.
Second, regarding the 40-man roster there are two issues: who do we remove and who do we add.
Who do we remove?
The answers are pretty obvious to me. We need to remove Chris Seddon, Blake Wood, Lars Anderson, Brent Lillibridge and Ezequiel Carrera.
Face it, these guys can be replaced by 4A guys any time we want to add one. Why waste roster spots on these guys?
If we need extra roster spots we then DFA, in order, Thomas Neal, Fabio Martinez and Cord Phelps
Also, we need to dump Jack Hannahan.
This gives us a total of 9 roster spots to work with, 5 being solid.
Who do we add?
Looking at the Indians players who are eligible for the Rule 5 draft, here is who we add: T.J. House, T.J. McFarland and Chun Chen.
Why not Jesus Aguilar, Trey Haley, Carlos Moncrief, Tim Fedroff, Bryce Stowell, Trey Haley, Rob Bryson or Giovanny Urshela? They won't stick even if they are drafted. They just aren't ready AND their upside is still questionable even if they did stick. There are reasons that guys who we feel are attractive selections never are even drafted in the Rule 5 and the above guys mirror all those reasons.
Why not Matt Packer, Austin Adams or Chen Lee? They were top prospects for the Indians last year but won't be ready and have to shake the dust off them for this season. They would probably not make the active roster long enough this year to be able to sent to the minors at the beginning of next year.
So we remove 5 and add 4, leaving us one open roster spot plus Hannahan's spot.
Now let's see what REALLY happens.
I have been posting on Indians' forums and blogging about the Indians for most of the last 30 years. Stop by here to read interesting articles and opinions not allowed on most Tribe forums. This site is not affiliated with the Cleveland Guardians
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Thursday, October 4, 2012
2012 Predictions - How did they work out?
Let's dust off my 2012 predictions and see how they worked out:
Columbus Clippers
Akron Aeros
Lake County
MVP: Felix Sterling, LeVon Washington
Biggest Surprise: LeVon Washington, Alex Lavisky, Kyle Blair
Biggest Disappointment: Francisco Lindor (he is too young and inexperienced to be here, just like Lavisky was last year)
Cleveland Indians
Record: 70-92
MVP: Justin Masterson
Biggest Surprise: Lonnie Chisenhall
Biggest Disappointment: Ubaldo Jimenez
Result: I was within two games of this disaster as the Indians finished 88-94. I think we will all agree that Jimenez was the biggest disappointment but Chisenhall getting hurt made that prediction impossible. That Chris Perez (or his mouth) was really the MVP speaks volumes of why we collapsed.
MVP: Justin Masterson
Biggest Surprise: Lonnie Chisenhall
Biggest Disappointment: Ubaldo Jimenez
Result: I was within two games of this disaster as the Indians finished 88-94. I think we will all agree that Jimenez was the biggest disappointment but Chisenhall getting hurt made that prediction impossible. That Chris Perez (or his mouth) was really the MVP speaks volumes of why we collapsed.
Columbus Clippers
This will be an interesting team. On paper it is the best team, top to bottom, that the Clippers have had. The starting pitching is great, the bullpen is deep, the position players are experienced and hungry and know, with a good performance, they stand a good chance to play in Cleveland this year.
Record: 85-59
MVP: Lonnie Chisenhall
Biggest Disappointment: Matt LaPorta
Biggest Surprise: Beau Mills
Record: 85-59
MVP: Lonnie Chisenhall
Biggest Disappointment: Matt LaPorta
Biggest Surprise: Beau Mills
Result: Well my prediction was off as they didn't even make the playoffs. They did finish 75-69 but their performance was relatively disappointing as was the performance of LaPorta (predicted) and the lack of performance/trade of Mills (not predicted)
Akron Aeros
Akron will benefit from the position player backup at Columbus. Their starting pitching will probably be weak but the bullpen is strong and the position players are mainly prospects with some talent who are, due to too many guys at AAA, are repeating this level.
Record: 83-61
MVP: Tim Fedroff, Jared Goedert
Biggest Surprise: Nick Weglarz, Rob Bryson
Biggest Disappointment: Kyle Bellows
Record: 83-61
MVP: Tim Fedroff, Jared Goedert
Biggest Surprise: Nick Weglarz, Rob Bryson
Biggest Disappointment: Kyle Bellows
Result: They finished 82-59 so I was close there. I was probably correct about the MVP if Fedroff and Goedert had stayed but was wrong about Weglarz, lukewarm regarding Bryson and dead on, in part due to injury, with Bellows.
Carolina Mudcats
Carolina Mudcats
New team, same league, different results. Carolina will finish with a 60-84 overall record and fail to make the playoffs.
Record: 60-84
MVP: Carlos Moncrief
Biggest Surprise: Cody Allen, Carlos Moncrief, Ronny Rodriguez
Biggest Disappointment: Tyler Holt, Jake Lowery, Tony Wolters (only because of his age)
Record: 60-84
MVP: Carlos Moncrief
Biggest Surprise: Cody Allen, Carlos Moncrief, Ronny Rodriguez
Biggest Disappointment: Tyler Holt, Jake Lowery, Tony Wolters (only because of his age)
Results: Again, close with the finish, they finished 63-77. Not close with the MVP as Moncrief didn't come on as I expected. Close with biggest surprise with Cody Allen and Ronny Rodriguez. Very close with the bigget disappointment being Lowery, lukewarm on Holt and wrong on Wolters as he exceeded my expectations.
Lake County
Same team, different year, different result. This team will sizzle this year. All the guys who underperformed there last year will perform very well this year.
Record: 90-54
Record: 90-54
MVP: Felix Sterling, LeVon Washington
Biggest Surprise: LeVon Washington, Alex Lavisky, Kyle Blair
Biggest Disappointment: Francisco Lindor (he is too young and inexperienced to be here, just like Lavisky was last year)
Results: They only finished 71-68 and when you look at my MVP candidates and biggest surprise candidates you can see why. I also was way wrong on LIndor although his offense was just passable, even for his age at this level. They did make it to the second round of the playoffs, however, and were tied after 6 innings of the deciding game in that round until Pasquale imploded.
So, there you have it. Not a bad set of predictions for 2012. Maybe I am getting better at this stuff or maybe I was just lucky this year.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
One game left and still drama
One game left and the top of the 2013 draft order is taking shape. Right now we know this about that order:
1. Houston
2. Cubs
3. Colorado
4. Minnesota
5. Cleveland with a magic number of 1 (that is, one victory by Florida or one loss by Cleveland)
6. Miami, unless they lose and Cleveland wins tomorrow; if they lose they have 6th place even if Cleveland loses
7. Boston, even with their 9 losses in 10 games slide, they still can only tie Cleveland (the Indians win the tiebreaker based on worse record in 2011) so they can't sneak up to 5th but might be able to end up 6th with a loss and a Miami win. If they tie Miami, the Marlins with the 2011 record tiebreaker.
8. Kansas City Magic number 1 - a Kansas City loss or a Toronto win locks up this slot for them.
9. Toronto - Magic number of 1 (one loss or a Mets win)
10. Mets unless they lose and Toronto wins, in which case they tie Toronto and win the 2011 record tiebreaker..
The issue here is that this is the raw slotting. MLB Trade Rumors is saying that the Pirates will slot in 9th since they couldn't sign Mark Appel last year and so right now, using that logic, Toronto is 10th and the Mets are 11th. The significance of that is only the top 10 slots in the first round are protected if you sign a free agent away from a team that has made him a qualifying offer (i.e., a $12-13 million one year contract). Therefore right now Toronto is 10th and the Mets are 11th if the Pittsburgh compensation pick really counts in that top 10.
Right now that top 8 above are guaranteed to have a protected first round pick in 2013. All the suspense that is left, and there is plenty of it, is who will pick 5th-10th next year and who will be the team that is left out of the top 10 due to Pittsburgh's compensation pick, if that pick even counts against the 10 protected picks in the first round. It is funny that a compensation pick for not signing a draft pick which would be lost if not used this year, could be used against that top 10 but that is what Trade Rumors is reporting.
1. Houston
2. Cubs
3. Colorado
4. Minnesota
5. Cleveland with a magic number of 1 (that is, one victory by Florida or one loss by Cleveland)
6. Miami, unless they lose and Cleveland wins tomorrow; if they lose they have 6th place even if Cleveland loses
7. Boston, even with their 9 losses in 10 games slide, they still can only tie Cleveland (the Indians win the tiebreaker based on worse record in 2011) so they can't sneak up to 5th but might be able to end up 6th with a loss and a Miami win. If they tie Miami, the Marlins with the 2011 record tiebreaker.
8. Kansas City Magic number 1 - a Kansas City loss or a Toronto win locks up this slot for them.
9. Toronto - Magic number of 1 (one loss or a Mets win)
10. Mets unless they lose and Toronto wins, in which case they tie Toronto and win the 2011 record tiebreaker..
The issue here is that this is the raw slotting. MLB Trade Rumors is saying that the Pirates will slot in 9th since they couldn't sign Mark Appel last year and so right now, using that logic, Toronto is 10th and the Mets are 11th. The significance of that is only the top 10 slots in the first round are protected if you sign a free agent away from a team that has made him a qualifying offer (i.e., a $12-13 million one year contract). Therefore right now Toronto is 10th and the Mets are 11th if the Pittsburgh compensation pick really counts in that top 10.
Right now that top 8 above are guaranteed to have a protected first round pick in 2013. All the suspense that is left, and there is plenty of it, is who will pick 5th-10th next year and who will be the team that is left out of the top 10 due to Pittsburgh's compensation pick, if that pick even counts against the 10 protected picks in the first round. It is funny that a compensation pick for not signing a draft pick which would be lost if not used this year, could be used against that top 10 but that is what Trade Rumors is reporting.
Monday, October 1, 2012
Who says there is no drama left this year!
We have 3 games to go and the 4th, 5th and 6th slots for next year's draft are still undecided (along with a bunch of other draft slots, of course).
For those of you following this blog you know that I have been keeping a running tally along the left margin to update you on where the Indians stand. This is also available on other sources, I am sure, one of those being mlbtraderumors.com.
Right now the Indians, on the heels of their 6-4 record in their last 10 games, have moved from the 4th slot in next year's draft to the 6th slot. They are currently 0.5 games behind Miami who have moved up the draft ladder by going 1-9 in their last 10 games. They are 1.5 games behind Minnesota who they have been battling over the last month for the 5th slot.
Miami finishes the season with three games against the Mets. Minnesota finishes with 3 games against Toronto. Cleveland finishes with three against the White Sox. Thus you would say that Cleveland has the advantage as Chicago is the only one of the three opponents that has not been eliminated from the pennant race. Unfortunately, due largely to the two games that the Tribe took last week from the White Sox in Chicago, the best the South Siders can do is tie for the AL Central Championship. The Detroit's magic number of 1 it is likely that the second and third games of this series will have the White Sox playing their AA/AAA roster against the Indians at some point as those guys have probably not gotten much PT with the Sox still in the race.
Also, Boston is two games "behind" the Indians at this point and if they lose all three and the Indians win all three Boston will pass Cleveland in the draft.
Why do we care about this? Well, if you are going to suck, suck bad so you get the highest draft pick. The higher the draft pick the better. The one thing we found out last year is that the budgets for each slot in the draft go up exponentially, it seems. Here are the budgets for the top 8 slots last year:
1. $7.2 million
2. $6.2 million
3. $5.2 million
4. $4.2 million
5. $3.5 million
6. $3.2 million
7. $3.0 million
8. $2.9 million
It's all about flexibility. The difference between the 1st slot and the 4th slot in the first round is $3 million. The difference between the 4th and 6th spot in the draft is $1 million. So, the higher your budget, the more flexibility you have to save money if you draft a guy who will sign for under slot. The Indians did that this year in drafting Tyler Naquin and Kieran Lovegrove for less than slot and using that excess to sign Mitch Brown and D'Vonne McClure to overslot bonuses. But still, you have more flexibility the higher you draft because the greater your budget, a lot of which is determined by your first round pick position.
If the Indians finish 4th and draft a player who they sign for $3.0 million or draft that same player 6th and they sign him for $3 million, the differeence is that they have $1 million extra to spend later on. The talent of the player is the same, just your budget for that pick is higher. Who wouldn't draft the more signable player 4th if you were going to draft him 6th?
Add to this that the draft this year will have fewer picks in it. There will be fewer compensation picks as teams have to first MAKE a qualifying offer to a free agent to get any compensation. That offer will be in the $13 million for a one year deal range so not many free agents will get that kind of offer. In addition, if a player gets a qualifying offer and signs with another team his former team is compensated with a sandwich pick BUT the first (or second) round pick by the team that signed the player is just lost, it doesn't go to the team that lost the player.
So, you are losing picks in the first and maybe second round due to teams signing free agents with qualifying offers and the compensation round, except for the competitive balance lottery winners (12 overall with the Indians getting a pick after the second round) is actually getting smaller so this draft should have less picks in the top 3 rounds than usual. That means more prospects available in every round and the team with the most picks and the highest budget should be able, with shrewd drafting, to get better talent than its competition AND not be subject to any penalties.
Add to all that that your options are better the higher you draft in EVERY round and while the difference between 1st and 8th in the draft is huge, the difference between even 4th and 6th is significant.
So, while we yawn through the last series of the season and grimace while we watch Vinnie Rottino, Casey Kotchman, Jack Hannahan and even Thomas Neal get ABs they don't deserve, realize that the Indians are still playing for something.
They are playing for flexibility in the 2013 draft. Go Tribe! Get some flexibility.
For those of you following this blog you know that I have been keeping a running tally along the left margin to update you on where the Indians stand. This is also available on other sources, I am sure, one of those being mlbtraderumors.com.
Right now the Indians, on the heels of their 6-4 record in their last 10 games, have moved from the 4th slot in next year's draft to the 6th slot. They are currently 0.5 games behind Miami who have moved up the draft ladder by going 1-9 in their last 10 games. They are 1.5 games behind Minnesota who they have been battling over the last month for the 5th slot.
Miami finishes the season with three games against the Mets. Minnesota finishes with 3 games against Toronto. Cleveland finishes with three against the White Sox. Thus you would say that Cleveland has the advantage as Chicago is the only one of the three opponents that has not been eliminated from the pennant race. Unfortunately, due largely to the two games that the Tribe took last week from the White Sox in Chicago, the best the South Siders can do is tie for the AL Central Championship. The Detroit's magic number of 1 it is likely that the second and third games of this series will have the White Sox playing their AA/AAA roster against the Indians at some point as those guys have probably not gotten much PT with the Sox still in the race.
Also, Boston is two games "behind" the Indians at this point and if they lose all three and the Indians win all three Boston will pass Cleveland in the draft.
Why do we care about this? Well, if you are going to suck, suck bad so you get the highest draft pick. The higher the draft pick the better. The one thing we found out last year is that the budgets for each slot in the draft go up exponentially, it seems. Here are the budgets for the top 8 slots last year:
1. $7.2 million
2. $6.2 million
3. $5.2 million
4. $4.2 million
5. $3.5 million
6. $3.2 million
7. $3.0 million
8. $2.9 million
It's all about flexibility. The difference between the 1st slot and the 4th slot in the first round is $3 million. The difference between the 4th and 6th spot in the draft is $1 million. So, the higher your budget, the more flexibility you have to save money if you draft a guy who will sign for under slot. The Indians did that this year in drafting Tyler Naquin and Kieran Lovegrove for less than slot and using that excess to sign Mitch Brown and D'Vonne McClure to overslot bonuses. But still, you have more flexibility the higher you draft because the greater your budget, a lot of which is determined by your first round pick position.
If the Indians finish 4th and draft a player who they sign for $3.0 million or draft that same player 6th and they sign him for $3 million, the differeence is that they have $1 million extra to spend later on. The talent of the player is the same, just your budget for that pick is higher. Who wouldn't draft the more signable player 4th if you were going to draft him 6th?
Add to this that the draft this year will have fewer picks in it. There will be fewer compensation picks as teams have to first MAKE a qualifying offer to a free agent to get any compensation. That offer will be in the $13 million for a one year deal range so not many free agents will get that kind of offer. In addition, if a player gets a qualifying offer and signs with another team his former team is compensated with a sandwich pick BUT the first (or second) round pick by the team that signed the player is just lost, it doesn't go to the team that lost the player.
So, you are losing picks in the first and maybe second round due to teams signing free agents with qualifying offers and the compensation round, except for the competitive balance lottery winners (12 overall with the Indians getting a pick after the second round) is actually getting smaller so this draft should have less picks in the top 3 rounds than usual. That means more prospects available in every round and the team with the most picks and the highest budget should be able, with shrewd drafting, to get better talent than its competition AND not be subject to any penalties.
Add to all that that your options are better the higher you draft in EVERY round and while the difference between 1st and 8th in the draft is huge, the difference between even 4th and 6th is significant.
So, while we yawn through the last series of the season and grimace while we watch Vinnie Rottino, Casey Kotchman, Jack Hannahan and even Thomas Neal get ABs they don't deserve, realize that the Indians are still playing for something.
They are playing for flexibility in the 2013 draft. Go Tribe! Get some flexibility.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Another in a long line of moronic moves.
When people are promoted in a company in many cases they leave a void. That is, there is no one good enough to replace them so they just pick the next guy in line, even if he is incompetent.
So it goes with the Cleveland Indians.
In another move whose timing can only be described as moronic, the Indians fired Manny Acta today.
What is to be gained by this? There are 6 freakin' games left!
Were the Indians ticked at Acta because he won 2 games in Chicago, jeopardizing their 4th slot in the draft next year?
Aside from that, what on earth could have caused them to fire him now?
Manny Acta stinks as a manager. I said when he was hired that it was a joke to have a guy who stunk it up in Washington as your manager. As I wrote before, his teams have tanked it after May in every year except when they stunk equally bad before and after May. Saying he did the best he can to win is like saying I did the best I could to be a major league baseball player. Lots of effort, no talent. Like me, Acta should have given up after little league.
But firing him now? Did Dolan fall asleep in June and just wake up now? I don't think so. But then why?
Here is my theory. Antonnetti knows he is gone and he was going to get the pleasure of publically humiliating Acta by dumping him now, during the season. Say what you want about Acta stinking but Antonnetti is the real cause of this mess. Between Antonnetti and Shapiro/Mirabelli/Grant, this franchise is so messed up it could very well, as I predicted after the Jimenez trade went south, not have another winning season for 10 years.
Now, that being said, they do have a GOOD chance to win next year if they invest in three players (#2 starter, power hitting RH firstbaseman AND left fielder) and if everyone has a good to great year. While you may laugh at this it is very possible. They really have a pretty strong team if they can get a couple or three pretty good players. No superstars like Pujols or Miguel Cabrera or Konerko but solid from 1-9, 1-5 and in innings 7-9, with REAL depth in the pitching staff.
This team, with the right manager, can win next year. I wonder if the Indians are thinking that manager is Sandy Alomar Jr. and wanted to snag him before his contract expired.
I hope so because if they canned Acta because they were upset with his perfomance this year, they were only about 60 games too late (actually almost 500 games too late for my taste). But, with that clown Antonnetti at the helm and with Shapiro apparently taking a hands off instead of hands around Antonnetti's throat approach, they could have really thought that firing your manager with 6 games left made some sort of statement to the fans about the team's desire to win next year.
So, Acta is gone and Antonnetti should be gone. If life was built around poetic justice, Antonnetti should be banned to being a vendor next year at the Prog. That way the few fans who show up will have the opportunity to tell Chris up close and personal what an idiot he is and how much they REALLY don't like that he has doomed this franchise to 10 years of bad, bad baseball.
Vinnie Rottino playing, Manny Acta fired. Yep, polish up that resume' Chris. You are on the street in days!
So it goes with the Cleveland Indians.
In another move whose timing can only be described as moronic, the Indians fired Manny Acta today.
What is to be gained by this? There are 6 freakin' games left!
Were the Indians ticked at Acta because he won 2 games in Chicago, jeopardizing their 4th slot in the draft next year?
Aside from that, what on earth could have caused them to fire him now?
Manny Acta stinks as a manager. I said when he was hired that it was a joke to have a guy who stunk it up in Washington as your manager. As I wrote before, his teams have tanked it after May in every year except when they stunk equally bad before and after May. Saying he did the best he can to win is like saying I did the best I could to be a major league baseball player. Lots of effort, no talent. Like me, Acta should have given up after little league.
But firing him now? Did Dolan fall asleep in June and just wake up now? I don't think so. But then why?
Here is my theory. Antonnetti knows he is gone and he was going to get the pleasure of publically humiliating Acta by dumping him now, during the season. Say what you want about Acta stinking but Antonnetti is the real cause of this mess. Between Antonnetti and Shapiro/Mirabelli/Grant, this franchise is so messed up it could very well, as I predicted after the Jimenez trade went south, not have another winning season for 10 years.
Now, that being said, they do have a GOOD chance to win next year if they invest in three players (#2 starter, power hitting RH firstbaseman AND left fielder) and if everyone has a good to great year. While you may laugh at this it is very possible. They really have a pretty strong team if they can get a couple or three pretty good players. No superstars like Pujols or Miguel Cabrera or Konerko but solid from 1-9, 1-5 and in innings 7-9, with REAL depth in the pitching staff.
This team, with the right manager, can win next year. I wonder if the Indians are thinking that manager is Sandy Alomar Jr. and wanted to snag him before his contract expired.
I hope so because if they canned Acta because they were upset with his perfomance this year, they were only about 60 games too late (actually almost 500 games too late for my taste). But, with that clown Antonnetti at the helm and with Shapiro apparently taking a hands off instead of hands around Antonnetti's throat approach, they could have really thought that firing your manager with 6 games left made some sort of statement to the fans about the team's desire to win next year.
So, Acta is gone and Antonnetti should be gone. If life was built around poetic justice, Antonnetti should be banned to being a vendor next year at the Prog. That way the few fans who show up will have the opportunity to tell Chris up close and personal what an idiot he is and how much they REALLY don't like that he has doomed this franchise to 10 years of bad, bad baseball.
Vinnie Rottino playing, Manny Acta fired. Yep, polish up that resume' Chris. You are on the street in days!
Saturday, September 15, 2012
Time to shut Zach McAllister down!!!!!
The Washington Nationals are making news by shutting down their young stud pitcher, Steven Strasburg in the middle of their first playoff run in, well, forever. That's right, they are in line to go the playoffs for the first time in their franchise history and they are shutting down maybe their best pitcher? Yes, they want to limit his innings coming back from Tommy John surgery.
So why am I telling you this?
The Indians have just lost Josh Tomlin. In 2010 Tomlin pitched 180 innings. The most he had pitched before that in a season is 145 innings. Flash forward to 2012 and Tomlin, pitching badly, goes down with Tommy John surgery.
Carlos Carrasco pitched 181 innings in 2009, the year the Indians got him in the Cliff Lee trade. The most he had ever pitched before that was 159 innings when the Phillies probably overused him two years before that in low A ball in as a 19 year old who had never pitched more than 83 innings!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Flash forward to 2011 and Carrasco had TJ surgery.
You could make the same case for Hector Rondon when he transitioned from rookie ball to Lake County in 2006. Ditto for Alexander Perez in 2009.
The Indians and other teams have had a philosophy where they don't want a starting pitcher's innings to increase by over a certain amount each year. They feel that puts extra stress on the pitcher's arm that, while it may not show up the next year, will show up in a few years in either worsening performance or in shoulder or elbow surgery.
So, here we are in the lost season of 2012. We need to speak about Zach McAllister.
The most innings McAllister has pitched previously in a season was in 2011 when he pitched 173 innings which was up from the 150 innings he pitched in 2010. At this point McAllister has pitched in 172 innings. He is likely to get 4 more starts in the 18 remaining games. That could push his numbers over 200 innings.
The question is, do we risk it? The answer is no. I think we shut him down after his next start, which is Wednesday, September 19th. That will give him a career high in innings but no an excessive increase over 2011 like the increase he had in 2011 compared to 2010. I think increasing his innings significantly for the second straight year could easily lead to a problem. Maybe not in 2013 but the risk would go up in 2014. If we are going to compete next year we need guys like McAllister to be injury-free and productive.
No sense burning out his arm this year. We have Gomez to backfill McAllister's spot in the rotation now that Huff is starting again. Time to shut McAllister down. I hope the Indians are listening!.
So why am I telling you this?
The Indians have just lost Josh Tomlin. In 2010 Tomlin pitched 180 innings. The most he had pitched before that in a season is 145 innings. Flash forward to 2012 and Tomlin, pitching badly, goes down with Tommy John surgery.
Carlos Carrasco pitched 181 innings in 2009, the year the Indians got him in the Cliff Lee trade. The most he had ever pitched before that was 159 innings when the Phillies probably overused him two years before that in low A ball in as a 19 year old who had never pitched more than 83 innings!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Flash forward to 2011 and Carrasco had TJ surgery.
You could make the same case for Hector Rondon when he transitioned from rookie ball to Lake County in 2006. Ditto for Alexander Perez in 2009.
The Indians and other teams have had a philosophy where they don't want a starting pitcher's innings to increase by over a certain amount each year. They feel that puts extra stress on the pitcher's arm that, while it may not show up the next year, will show up in a few years in either worsening performance or in shoulder or elbow surgery.
So, here we are in the lost season of 2012. We need to speak about Zach McAllister.
The most innings McAllister has pitched previously in a season was in 2011 when he pitched 173 innings which was up from the 150 innings he pitched in 2010. At this point McAllister has pitched in 172 innings. He is likely to get 4 more starts in the 18 remaining games. That could push his numbers over 200 innings.
The question is, do we risk it? The answer is no. I think we shut him down after his next start, which is Wednesday, September 19th. That will give him a career high in innings but no an excessive increase over 2011 like the increase he had in 2011 compared to 2010. I think increasing his innings significantly for the second straight year could easily lead to a problem. Maybe not in 2013 but the risk would go up in 2014. If we are going to compete next year we need guys like McAllister to be injury-free and productive.
No sense burning out his arm this year. We have Gomez to backfill McAllister's spot in the rotation now that Huff is starting again. Time to shut McAllister down. I hope the Indians are listening!.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Why is Brent Lillibridge still with this team?
He is pathetic.
Can someone please explain to me why Juan Diaz is not up here right now?
No one can seriously think that Lillibridge should be on this team next year. Not only is he bad but that would require that he occupy a roster spot all winter, something that for a small market team is unthinkable: expose another player to the Rule 5 draft to protect a AAAA guy who is a dime-a-dozen and can signed to a minor league deal any day.
While Diaz may not be completely ready, he is already on the 40 man roster and actually HAS a future in the majors. He should waive to Lillibridge on the way up as Lillibridge is on the way down.
C'mon, Antonnetti. The tryout is over and Lillibridge sucks. Dump him and bring up Diaz!
Can someone please explain to me why Juan Diaz is not up here right now?
No one can seriously think that Lillibridge should be on this team next year. Not only is he bad but that would require that he occupy a roster spot all winter, something that for a small market team is unthinkable: expose another player to the Rule 5 draft to protect a AAAA guy who is a dime-a-dozen and can signed to a minor league deal any day.
While Diaz may not be completely ready, he is already on the 40 man roster and actually HAS a future in the majors. He should waive to Lillibridge on the way up as Lillibridge is on the way down.
C'mon, Antonnetti. The tryout is over and Lillibridge sucks. Dump him and bring up Diaz!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)