Thursday, February 29, 2024

Do the Guardians NRI Signings Really Suck As Bad As I Think They Do?

 Looking back over the past 3 years of NRI invitees I am fighting mad.   Here are the players the Guardians brought in as VETERAN non-roster invitees to spring training:

2022 -  Anthony Castro, Yohan Ramirez, Alex Young, Ian Gibault, Jake Jewell, Sandy Leon

2023 - Touki Toussaint, Caleb Barager, Dusten Knight, Caleb Simpson, Roman Quinn, Zack Collins, Daniel Norris (at end of ST)

2024 - Adam Oller, Jamie Barria, Carlos Carrasco, Anthony Banda,Tyler Zuber, Dom Nunez

 This is a pathetic list.  Unless Carrasco ends up having a real comeback season, none of these guys, ZERO, stand even a small chance to make any significant impact on the Guardians.  NONE.

The Guardians have to do better than this.  I mean, just looking back, since Feb. 1st this year the following players, among others, received MiLB deals with non-roster invitations to spring training:

Francisco Mejia C (Feb. 29)
Kolten Wong, 2B (Feb. 28)
Tim Locastro P (Feb 28)
Julio Teheran P (Feb 27)
Jason Alexander P (Feb. 27)
Matt Barnes P (Feb 27)
Naoyuk Usasawa P (Feb 26)
Garrett Cooper 1B (Feb 25)
Cam Gallagher C (Feb 24)
Derek Law P (Feb 22)
Francisco Perez P (Feb 20)
David Peralta OF (Feb. 19)
Chase Anderson P (Feb 17)
Bryan Shaw P (Feb. 16)
Zach Davies P (Feb 15)
Jacob Barnes P (Feb 15)
Curt Casali C (Feb 12)
Adrian Sampson P (Feb 12)
Jesse Winker OF (Feb 12)
Luis Perdomo P (Feb 10)

Just look at the guys who signed minor league deals as NRIs with other teams since February 1st.  Don't even look at the guys who signed those deals in December and January.  Just look at the recent ones.   It is embarrassing who we signed compared to who was available.

History tells you that the 2024 NRIs have just as little chance to help this team as those from 2023 and 2022.  But we still keep signing these guys who are no more than AA and AAA roster fillers instead of preparing ourselves for inevitable injuries that occur.  

I understand the 165 minor league player limit.  I understand that the better minor league FAs all want opt-out clauses that, without injuries to ML players, sometimes make it hard to keep these players past opening day or May 1st.  I also understand that by having guys like this means that if you have to bring them up to the majors in an emergency,  it doesn't hurt as much to DFA or release them if they don't have a spot on the team. Hey, I don't mind signing guys like we do, but they can't be the only NRIs you bring in.  You have to bring in guys who actually have a chance to help this team coming out of ST if the need is there.  None of these guys do.

This is not a good look for a franchise that saw it doesn't have the money to sign quality or even lower level ML free agents.  You can't have it both ways.   You have to bring in talent either in major league free agents or minor league free agents who have ML track records of success in case you have injuries.  If, like the past two years, these NRIs get play during the ML season the fans have a right to be fighting mad.  The Guardians have played the same game the last 2 years and it has hurt the performance of the team.

It is time to stop this bottom feeding and do the right thing for the fans in Cleveland.  I mean, bringing in quality NRIs is the very LEAST the FO and ownership can do to help us prepare for the season.

Why they don't do this so the fans can field team without career minor leaguers on the roster is bewildering to me.

Tuesday, February 27, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 9 - Let's Look at Trends at the Top of the Past 10 Drafts - DH, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B, C

 OK, in the 3rd of this series we will look at the remaining players drafted in the top 10 picks of each of the last 10 drafts (100 players total).  So far we have looked at outfielders (30 players) and pitchers (38 players).  In this post we will look at the remaining 32 players who cover all the infield positions (C, 1B, 2B, SS and 3B).  As in part 8, the players in bold are HS players.  Their draft slot is in parentheses

DESIGNATED HITTER (One player drafted)

2014 - Kyle Schwarber (4)

CATCHER (Seven)

2023 - Blake Mitchell (8)
2021 - Henry Davis (1) 
2019 - Adley Rutschman (1), Shea Langeliers (9)
2018 - Joey Bart (2)
2016 - Zack Collins (10)
2014 - Alex Jackson (6)

FIRST BASE (Four)

2022 - Jacob Berry (6)
2020 - Spencer Torkelson (1)
2019 - Andrew Vaughan (3)
2017 - Keston Hiura (9)

SECOND BASE (Five)

2022 - Temarr Johnson (4)
2020 - Austin Martin (5), Nick Gonzales (7)  
2018 - Jonathon India (5)
2015 - Brendan Rogers (3)

SHORTSTOP (Eight)

2023 - Jacob Wilson (6)
2022 - Jackson Holliday (1), Brooks Lee (8)
2021 - Macelo Mayer (4), Jordan Lawler (6)
2019 - Bobby Witt Ir. (2), C. J. Abrams (6)
2016 - Dansby Swanson (1)

THIRD BASE (SIX)

2019 - Josh Jung (8)
2018 - Alec Bohm (3), Nick Madrigal (4)
2017 - Royce Lewis (1)
2016 - Nick Senzel (2)
2015 - Alex Bregman (2)

SUMMARY
  • Interestingly, except for DH, all groups are represented in 4, 5 or 6 drafts.  
  • Except for DH and secondbasemen, at least one 1-1 draft pick came from catcher, 1B, SS and 3B.
  • Two 1-1 picks were college catchers
  • Only 10 of 29 of these players were HS kids and, unsurprisingly, 5 of those were HS shortstops
  • Of the players on the above list, six of them were the #1 overall pick including 2 catchers (Rutschman, Davis), 2 shortstops (Swanson, Holliday), 1 third baseman (Lewis) and 1 firstbaseman (Torkelson)
  • 13 were drafted in slots 1-3, 11 in slots 4-6, 7 in slots 7-10.
  • Third basemen were drafted higher, on average, than any other group.  
  • Buoyed by the higher percentage of shortstops were drafted out of high school more shortstops were drafted than any other position in the listings above, but still fewer than either pitcher or outfielder, if you refer back to Part 7 and 8.
Going just by trends, it would not be impossible to imagine any of these groups from being eliminated, a priori, from being a 1-1 pick.  Obviously, it would depend on the talent in an individual draft, but none of this, just based on trends from the last 10 drafts, eliminates JJ Wetherholt, Travis Bazzana or Nick Kurtz, although Bazzana, as a second baseman, at 1-1 would buck the trends seen at the top of the last 10 drafts, with the highest second baseman having been drafted 1-4.  

Note that the only one 2 way player drafted in the top 10 of any group is Brendan McKay, drafted 4th in 2017.  And we know how that turned out.

Well, there it is.  Looking at the last three installments in this series in total, it would not be impossible to believe that, a priori, any position is out of the question for the Guardians to take #1.  Certainly, HS catchers, outfielders and second baseman would be unlikely and even college second basemen would be problematic, unless that player would be drafted with the intent to move him to a different position which, of course, breaks one of my cardinal rules of the draft: don't draft a high first round pick if the intent is to have him change positions to one he has not played before.

More on the draft coming up in the future.  I hope you enjoyed this 3 part series on trends from the top of the last 10 drafts!

Monday, February 26, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 8 - Let's Look at Trends at the Top of the Past 10 Drafts - Pitchers

 If you read part 7, you know the drill.  In this post we will be looking at pitchers drafted in the last 10 drafts (2014-2023) in the first 10 picks of the draft.  So, let's dive in:

NOTE: High school players are in bold.

2014 - Brady Aiken (1), Tyler Kolek (2), Carlos Rodon (3), Aaron Nola (7), Kyle Freeland (8), Jeff Hoffman (9)

2015 - Dillon Tate (4), Tyler Jay (5), Carson Fulmer (8)

2016 - Ian Anderson (3), Riley Pint (4), AJ Puk (6), Braxton Garrett (7), Cal Quantrill (8), Matt Manning (9)

2017 - Hunter Greene (2), MacKenzie Gore (3), Brendan McKay (4), Kyle Wright (5)

2018 - Casey Mize (1), Ryan Weathers (7), Carter Stewart (8)

2019 - Nick Lodolo (9)

2020 - Max Meyer (3), Asa Lacy (4), Emerson Hancock (6), Reid Detmers (10)

2021 - Jack Leiter (2), Jackson Jobe (3), Frank Mozzicato (7), Sam Bachman (8), Kumar Rocker (9)

2022 - Kumar Rocker (3), Cade Horton (7)

2023 - Paul Skenes (1), Rhett Lowder (7), Chase Dollander (9), Noble Meyer (10)

SUMMARY

In the past 10 Drafts only 3 pitchers (Brady Aiken, Casey Mize, Paul Skenes) have gone #1 overall.  38% of picks in the first 10 picks of the last 10 drafts have been pitchers with only 13 being HS pitchers and 25 being college pitchers.  Of those 38, 12 drafted within the first 3 picks of a draft, 8 in slots 4-6 and 18 were selected in slots 7-10.  

Nothing here would say that the Guardians should avoid picking a college pitcher 1-1.  As 70% of the 1-1 picks in past 10 drafts have been position players and it could have easily been 80% if Crews, the consensus #1 prospect, had gone 1-1 instead of 1-2 last year, the trend would say that the Guardians should go position player in the 1st round unless a college pitcher just blows away the other 1-1 candidates in terms of spring performance combined with the scouting of those players over the previous 2 years.


Sunday, February 25, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 7 - Let's Look At Trends Near the Top of the Past 10 Drafts - Outfielders

 Each draft is different.  The strength of the total player pool and individual player types differ.  In 2023, most of the top picks were outfielders, more in any year since 2015.  The strength at the top and the depth throughout the draft differ, too.  For example, 2023 was probably a stronger draft because of the 5-round 2020, COVID-year draft.  Most HS kids who weren't drafted or were drafted and didn't sign in 2020 were eligible for the 1st time in 2023 as college juniors.  So, by definition, 2024 may be weak compared to 2023, as it should revert back to an average year, although experts think that 2024 will be weak even compared to an average draft year.

Although drafts vary in strength and depth, patterns can be discerned.  As we are drafting 1-1, let's limit the analysis of these trends to the first 10 picks in each draft (2014-2023) and see what patterns, per position, we can see for these 100 picks.

Here are the raw numbers for the sum of the first 10 picks for the last 10 drafts:

  • 30 outfielders (30% of 10 ten picks in those drafts) were selected
  • 15 were HS outfielders and 15 were from college
  • Here is the breakdown by which slot these 30 players were selected (C = college, HS = high school)
    • #1 - 1 HS (Mickey Moniak, 2016)
    • #2 - 2 C, 1 HS
    • #3 - 1 HS
    • #4 - 2 C
    • #5 - 5 HS, 2 C
    • #6 - 2 HS
    • #7 - 2 C
    • #8 - 3 HS, 2 C
    • #9 - 2 C
    • #10 - 2 HS, 3 C
    • Looking at the first 3 picks we 3 HS and 2 college outfielders; in picks 4-6 we see 7 HS and 4 college OFers; in picks 7-10 we see 9 college outfielders and 5 HS outfielders.
  • Players and year
    • 2014 - Nick Gordon (5), Michael Conforto (10)
    • 2015 - Kyle Tucker (5), Andrew Benintendi (7), Ian Happ (9), Cornelius Randolph (10)
    • 2016 - Moniak, Corey Ray (5)
    • 2017 - Austin Beck (6), Pavin Smith (7), Adam Haseley (8), Jo Adell (10)
    • 2018 - Jared Kelenic (6), Kyler Murray (9), Travis Swaggerty (10)
    • 2019 - JJ Bleday (4), Riley Greene (5), Hunter Bishop (10)
    • 2020 - Heston Kjerstad (2), Robert Hassell (8), Zac Veen (9)
    • 2021 - Colton Cowser (5), Benny Montgomery (8)
    • 2022 - Druw Jones (2), Elijah Green (5), Gavin Cross (9)
    • 2023 - Dylan Crews (2), Max Clark (3), Wyatt Langford ((4), Walker Jenkins (5)
 SUMMARY

Only one time in the last ten drafts has an outfielder been selected #1 overall and that was a HS outfielder, Mickey Moniak who had been a non-factor in MLB until a breakout 2023 season.  No college outfielders were selected #1 overall, although 2 very good prospects, Dylan Crews and Heston Kjerstad, were selected #2 overall, as was HS outfielder Druw Jones, the latter slowly sliding down prospect lists since his draft.  Also, between 2014 and 2019 I only see 5 guys (Conforto, Tucker, Benitendi, Happ and Riley Greene) who I think are really good players.  Others may become good MLers but there were a lot of misses or marginal OFers drafted in the top 10 pitcks in those 10 years and, in most cases, those guys were not near the top of their class in those draft years.  That is, it is only in hindsight that these guys look better than their draft slots.  

Crews was the consensus #1 overall prospect in 2023 but Kjerstad was only the #10 prospect in 2020.  Lots of good players like Conforto, Tucker. Benintendi, Happ have been drafted and if we draft a player of their ilk, or even Colton Cowser, that would be a good, solid selection.  

However, it is not like it is common to draft a college outfielder #1 overall as there have been more college first basemen drafted #1 overall in the past 10 drafts than college outfielders and, even if you count Crews, it is still tied.  It also seems like drafting HS outfielders high inthe first round of the draft in the last 10 years has met with only spotty success, although people can always dream on coming up with Kyle Tucker part deux. 

So how does this impact our #1 overall pick?  It seems that these trends would indicate that we shouldn't bend over backwards to draft an outfielder (college or HS) unless they are clearly at the top of their class come draft time.   It also seems that HS outfielders are preferred early in the draft with college outfielders preferred later in the top 10 picks and that the college outfielders selected are more in the solid MLer category rather than start ML category, although some of that is in the eye of the beholder.   The odds of coming up with a stud player, the type you want to get at 1-1, just are not that good when you draft an outfielder, and those odds seem to go down when you are drafting a toolsy outfielder who needs to develop.  

So, when I see people talking about Charlie Condon, Vance Honeycutt, Seaver King or Mike Sirota or even Konnor Griffin  or Braden Montgomery at 1-1 I am very wary of those picks, especially Honeycutt.  It's going to take a really good spring PLUS good reports from the last couple of years (i.e, no fast risers from where they were in December, 2023), to get me to want to bite on an outfielder at 1-1.  All those guys should be solid first round draft picks but, at 1-1, just don't seem to cut the mustard, at least for me based ont he trends I see from the previous 10 years.

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

First Blush Look at What the 26-man Would Look Like On Opening Day

 Wow, we haven't even played the first spring training game so we don't even know how injuries would play out through the end of spring training.  

But operating in a perfect world where no one gets injured and everyone performs at an acceptable level, here are my first thoughts about what I think the opening day roster should be.

BENCH/DH

Starting at the end and working back here, I think the most important decisions will be here.  What we are looking for here are guys who can play multiple positions, thus maximizing our bench flexibility and allowing us to have a 4-man bench. So here are my thoughts:

Austin Hedges  C
David Fry C, 1B, 3B, LF, RF
Tyler Freeman 2B, SS, 3B, LF
Deyvison De Los Santos 3B, 1B, LF, RF
Ramon Laureano RF, CF, LF

Reasoning: Fry provides us hitting at 4 positions.   Freeman provides the best current hitting in a backup role of all of our middle infielders and is acceptable defensively.  Laureano is going to make this team unless he is traded which, given his salary, is unlikely.  

Note that this permutation, as the title describes, includes a 5th player (one over normal bench size) who would get ABs as our DH.   I think this means that our DH is rotating between Freeman, De Los Santos, Fry and Florial (see below).

When I see this bench I see guys like Hedges, Fry and Laureano who don't need a lot of ABs.  True veteran backups who soak up whatever playing time is available.  De Los Santos gets whatever ABs he can from DHing and only sees the field once in a blue moon...unless there is an injury, of course. De Los Santos, however, will likely NOT be the primary DH, just someone who can get some ABs there as we evaluate him to maybe begin 2025 in AAA.  Freeman gets a lot of ABs in this permuatation, moving around the IF and, hopefully, the OF as well as being one of the primary DHs.

STARTING POSITION PLAYERS

C - Bo Naylor
1B - Josh Naylor
2B - Andres Gimenez
SS - Gabriel Arias
3B - Jose Ramirez
LF - Steven Kwan
CF - Myles Straw
RF - Estevan Florial

Reasoning - Most of this is set in stone.  I just don't believe that Straw will be able to be traded and I think he will get the first shot in CF.  Arias will get the first shot at SS and Florial will get a shot in RF, backed up by Laureano as a platoon.  I see very few scenarios where Straw, if he is on the team, begins the year on the bench.  But I do see a lot of situations as we get into the season where Florial and Laureano are in the lineup together and Straw is our 4th outfielder/pinch runner/defensive replacement. 

This permutation means that Brennan, Rocchio, Jonathon Rodriguez, Jhonkensy Noel, Jose Tena, Juan Brito and Angel Martinez start the year in Columbus.   This is all acceptable to me given that we have to give guys the opportunity to play and we want these guys in Columbus getting regular playing time so they are polished when we need them...and we likely will need them all at some point this year.

ROTATION

Beiber
McKenzie
Allen
Bibee
Williams

Reasoning - If this rotation is healthy I can't see them going with anyone else or with a 6-man rotation.  If someone has to start the year on the IL then Lively is our 6th starter, Gaddis is at 7 and Curry, as an opener, is at 8.  If everyone is healthy, Gaddis and Lively start the year at AAA and Curry is our long man, which leads into a discussion of the bullpen.,,

BULLPEN

Closer - Clase
Setup/backup closer - Barlow
Setup - Stephan
Middle Relievers: Morgan, Hentges, Sandlin, Karinchak
Long man - Curry

Reasoning - This is our bullpen from last year with Barlow substituting for Enyel De Los Santos.  It should be a solid bullpen and has arms like Herrin, Aleman and Cade Smith and, of course, our AAAA minor league invitees backing them up.  The latter group should only be in play if we have multiple, significant injuries because we will likely have a full 40-man roster.   Smith and Herrin should be first men up in case of an injury because they are both rostered and the choice between Aleman and the AAAA guys will likely be based on the fact that the AAAA guys are fungible if we have to DFA one of them to take someone off the IL or bring up another non-rostered guy from the minors.  Aleman may not be called up because he would still be considered an asset at that point who we would not want to lose on waivers.

SUMMARY

So, this is my logic as we start full workouts.    I know different people will have different opinions but I think Fry deserves to be on this roster and I think Florial and De Los Santos will be given every regular season opportunity to fail, just like Bobby Bradley, Franmil Reyes and Oscar Gonzalez were.  The rest of the team, barring injuries, is pretty set and we even have some flex for injuries on the position player side, with less quality flexibility in the bullpen and even less in the rotation, although it's not like our 26-man roster guys with AAAA guys being our only backups in either the rotation or the bullpen.

Tuesday, February 20, 2024

The Race to Be 1-1 in 2024 - Part 1 - Reviewing the First College Weekend

 The race for who will be selected 1-1 in 2024 has officially begun.

First, my disclaimer.  I give less weight to what a guy has done more recently than most people do.  For both college and HS players, between playing for their school and all the summer ball and showcase circuit looks that scouts have, they have a good book on all players.  In my opinion guys should fall MUCH more than they should rise based on the small sample size of their 2024 seasons.  

Still, we are talking 1-1 here so nuance between similar guys DOES matter and, in situations where guys at the very top do look meh in their 2024 play, a guy MIGHT, if all the stars align, sneak into the #1 slot if every other reasonable option falls on his face for some reason (performance, off-field stuff, injury).

So let's dive in, looking at how guys are doing:

TOP 6

1. JJ Wetherholt - He was easing into his college season vs. Stetson (4-13, 3 SB) while playing SS.  However, he ended that weekend yesterday when he injured his hamstring.  Any injury in your draft year is significant so this is something to watch.  

2. Nick Kurtz -  I did a little more of deeper dive into Kurtz's weekend than I did with any other player.  In his first 3 games he went 4-12 with 1 HR, 1 BB and 1 K, while easing into his season.  Nothing spectacular, just solid.  In the deeper dive I found that he averaged 3 pitches per AB, explaining having only 1 walk.  Of the 52 pitches he saw he only swung and missed 4 times, had 9 called strikes, 19 balls and 9 fouls.  When he put the ball in play, besides his hits, he hit 4 FO to LF (and one single), 3 FO to CF (2 advanced runners) and 0 FO to RF (2 singles, 1 HR).  He did not hit a groundball at all, none for outs and none of his hits were ground balls.  So, an inordinate number of balls hit to LF, trying to lift every ball but showing excellent bat-to-ball skills for a power hitter.  Not a great weekend.  Nothing to write home about, just him not moving down in my thinking...but nothing to solidify him being 1-1 over his competitors.

3. Travis Bazzana - He had the best weekend of any of the hitters truly competing for selection at 1-1.  The videos of his pre-season work on his own showed that he likely hit the ground running, maybe more than anyone else at the top of this draft class.  The results were indisputable: co-national player of the week,  9-16, 1 2B, 1 3B, 3 HR, 2 SB, 3 BB, 4 K.  The best first weekend of any of the players in the conversation for 1-1.  I will say this, though.  On the video of his triple he didn't exactly appear like he was burning it around the bases so I am wondering about his 60 speed grade, at least a little right now.  Has he thickened up at all, sacrificing speed for more power?  Time will tell.

4. Charlie Condon - His first weekend he went 7-11 with 3 doubles, 2 BB and 1 K, against weak competition, basically holding serve for his lofty position in this draft class.

5. Joc Caglianone - He went 2-4 with a walk while playing 1B in the only game of a 3 game series against St. John that was NOT rained out.  

6. Vance Honeycutt - The only potential 5-tool player at the top of this draft, Honeycutt came in with questions about his hit tool and contact rate.  He has never hit over .300 in college and has a problem with contact, striking out a lot.  In his first weekend over 15 plate appearances  (12 ABs). Honeycutt showed his penchant for hitting for power (2 HRs), but also went 2-12 with 4 Ks,  It's early, but nothing in this first weekend causes him to move up, IMHO.

THE RISER(S) OF THE WEEK

Risers, to me, are guys who actually have a chance to get to 1-1.  Yeah, guys have great weekends and great seasons but only certain guys have the stuff to make them worth the gamble of being selected at 1-1.  It's early in the season so we only have one riser this week:

Chase Burns - Burns came into the season with hype regarding his fastball (regularly hits 100 mph) and slider (true swing-and-miss monster) and acceptance of his control as being at least average,  but questions about the straightness of his FB (23 HR in 152 college innings), his command and his lack of a 3rd pitch.  If he doesn't show that his 3rd pitch is at least average right now, he could be destined for the bullpen...and you don't want to draft a guy 1-1 if you are hoping for significant improvement to justify that lofty selection.

In his first start of the year, he did exactly what you would expect against lesser competition from a cold-weather state: he dominated.  Showing his good FB velocity, wipeout slider and control, he ended up keeping himself at least in the discussion for 1-1 with a 6 IP, 3 H, 0 R, 1 BB and 10 K game. He threw 88 pitches, a little high for a 1st start.  Two of the 3 singles he gave up were in his last inning.  For the game, not counting the balls in play, he had 23 swinging strikes, 17 called strikes, 10 foul balls and threw an alarming 30 balls, meaning he threw close to 40% balls.  Rust and nerves in his first time out?  Probably.  But he had at least good control last year and this did not look like good control although he didn't allow hard contact, either. 

So, Burns kept himself in the conversation at 1-1 but it doesn't appear that he enhanced his status, either.

Monday, February 19, 2024

Prospects On the Hot Seat This Spring

When I title a post like this, people might think I am going to be talking about prospects who are close to or in the majors; those who have not established themselves yet but are on the brink of being MLB regulars or disappearing into the minors forever as AAAA players.  So, while guys like Jose Tena, Angel Martinez, Juan Brito, Tyler Freeman, Brayan Rocchio, Gabrel Arias, Jhonkensy Noel, George Valera, Jonathon Rodriguez, Estevan Florial, Deyvison De Los Santos, Daniel Espino, Will Brennan and others have a lot to prove in what might be a make-or-break year for many of them, that is not who this post is about.

Instead, let's talk about guys further down the minors who truly are at an important crossroad in their career.  Guys who need to do it this year or maybe never will, at least not with Cleveland.   Not all of this pressure falls on the shoulders of the players, either.  It falls on the people who drafted them very high in the draft, front offices who acquired them in trades for viable major leaguers and in the Player Development department whose job it is enhance the skills that these players came to the Guardians with.

So let's dive in...in no particular order of importance.

Alex Mooney, SS - 2023 draft 6th round (bonus $1 million, equivalent to a 2nd rd. pick)

Why am I starting with a 6th round draft pick you might ask?  Mooney, to me, is the poster child for this draft team.  Since we have gone to 20 rounds in this draft, the Guardians had signed every player they drafted in both 2021 and 2022.  They also went over the bonus allotment by 4.99% in both years, meaning they spent as much money as they could spend on those 21 picks each year without forfeiting a draft choice.  Basically, they had a blueprint and worked that blueprint to perfection.  Not that I liked the 2022 draft.  I didn't.  But you gotta give them credit.  The guys they drafted they fit into that bonus allotment like world-class jigsaw puzzle masters.

Then we come to 2023.  Last year the Guardians signed only 19 of their 21 selections.   Well that's pretty good, you say.  But it's not 21, like in the previous 2 years.  

One hypothesis is that Mooney, a draft-eligible sophomore, required a much higher bonus than anticipated.  For a master jigsaw puzzle guy you just can't give them a puzzle piece bigger than what it is supposed to be or the whole thing doesn't fit together.   I think that is what happened with Mooney.  I think the intent all along was to sign Mac Heuer and Ryan Marohn.   However, when Mooney requested a larger bonus  ($1 million, making him, essentially, as important as a 2nd round pick) than expected and stuck to those demands, the Guardians had two choices.  Punt on Mooney and sign the two HS pitchers or sign Mooney and lose the two HS pitchers, both of whom, in my opinion, were set to sign for bonuses right in line with the puzzle pieces within the bonus structure they represented.

I think they decided that Mooney, a draft-eligible sophomore, was a higher priority and gave him a HUGE bonus for a 6th round pick.

So that is why Mr. Mooney and the Guardians draft brain trust is on the hot seat. That plus the fact that Mooney's first minor league season sucked huge, rotten eggs.  He hit .152 with a .470 OPS.

Million dollar college bonus babies shouldn't struggle like that against 18-, 19- and 20-year olds.  So let's give Mr. Mooney a mulligan on last year.  

But, this year, he and the Guardians' draft team have a lot to prove relative to him not only proving he is worth that bonus but proving that he was worth more than Mr. Marohn and Mr. Heuer.

Parker Messick, LHP - 2022 Draft - 2nd round

The Guardians stacked the deck in Messick's favor by starting him at Lynchburg last year.  On paper, he was only slightly older than average but that is skewed somewhat as teams will send their organizational soldiers (like the Guardians with college late round draft picks Tyrese Turner and others) there to fill holes on teams.  For a 22 year old 2nd round pick to start his pro career at Lynchburg stacks the deck in his favor.  The soft tossing, command specialist did OK at A ball but had a 1.1 WHIP against younger hitters with only 1 HR allowed.  When he promoted mid-season to the more age-appropriate Lake County, his numbers tanked with a 1.33 WHIP and 10 HR and 11 HB in 65 IP.  To his credit he maintained his K rate after the promotion with almost a doubling of his walk rate.

Messick's performance was one of the most disappointing for a 2022 Guardians' draft pick and had t not been for the poor performances by Joe Lampe and the poor Lake County performance by Nate Furman after his promotion from Lynchburg, Messick's poor stats at Lake County would look even worse.

The issue with Messick was that he didn't have power pitches to get hitters out, leading to long ABs and short outings, with him only going 4+ innings on average in Lynchburg.  His innings total was good at 121, up from 98 in college so he is set for a full season in 2024 where he will likely either make or break his career.  

Messick wasn't a terrible pick, but in my 2022 mock draft I went for a hitter rather than a soft-tossing college pitcher who I felt didn't have a very high ceiling.  Between Messick and Player Development, let's hope they can produce a guy worthy of a second round pick.

Doug Nikhazy, LHP, 2nd rd, 2021 and Tommy Mace, RHP, 2 rd supplemental, 2021

This is a classic case of good draft picks not developing or, at best, developing more slowly than expected.  Nikhazy has not harnessed his control in 2 full years in the minors, walking almost 100 batters in 2023 and Mace not harnessing his command/developed his stuff, leading to him not missing many bats during the 2023 season.

Call it the Guardians' pitching factory, call in the Guardians' Finishing School for College Pitchers...call it what you want.  The truth is that whatever the pitching gurus in Cleveland are selling, Nikhazy and Mace are not buying.  

Is it possible that we have lost enough pitching development people that the 'factory' is non-operational any longer?  Maybe.  

To me, this is a no-brainer.  These polished college pitchers should be more effective than they are now, especially when you consider the success that almost every college pitcher picked in the 2021 draft by Cleveland has been more effective than Nikhazy and Mace.  Almost every one.  Look it up.

The Guardians need Nikhazy and Mace to develop to provide major league depth in the second half of th 2024 or, at least, be valuable trade bait.  The factory needs to get their machinery running and tool up these guys.

Tanner Burns, RHP, 1st rd. supplemental, 2020

2020, outside of Logan Allen, was a really disappointing draft for the Guardians.  There is still a chance for this draft and a lot of the improvement in the output would come from Burns positioning himself as a ML pitching option.  

Burns, like Mace, has shown very limited ability to miss bats.  However, when he was moved to the bullpen in Akron last August, he pitche in 10 games, putting up 11.2 innings and gave up 2 ER on 9 hits, 3 BB and 9 K and 0 HR.

Obviously relievers can hump up on the fastball and Burns certainly showed an increase in velocity when I saw him out of the bullpen, hitting 94-95 compared to his 91-92 as a starter.  This made his off-speed stuff play up.  

As the 15 appearances he made out of the bullpen in 2024 were the first he had EVER made in his college/pro career, there is a lot to dream on with him making a big jump as a reliever in 2024, maybe even ending up in the Guardians' bullpen or as a valuable trade chip at some point in calendar 2024.  However, if he fails to make this conversion, he now becomes a failed professional starter and a failed professional reliever after being moved from starter.  That is a tough sell for any organization to give him an extended chance in AAA, let alone the majors.

Pitching factory...have at it!

Joe Lampe OF, 3rd rd 2022, Justin Boyd OF 2S, 2022 (Reds), Nate Furman 2B, 4th round 2022, Steve Hajjar, LHP, 2nd rd, 2021 (Twins)

I have lumped these 4 together because they are all over-hyped underperformers.  Lampe and Furman are LH slap hitters from the 2022 draft and Boyd and Hajjar were obtained for Will Benson, with Boyd being a 2nd round supplemental pick in 2022.  

None of them performed well in 2023 with Boyd (.140 BA, .490 OPS at Lake County) and Hajjar (52 BB/57 innings at Lake County) being pathetic and Lampe and Furman just being bad at Lake County, although Furman looked good beating up younger pitchers at Lynchburg.  This, again, a situation where the players themselves and the Player Development department have to pull a rabbit out of a hat and turn these guys into viable prospects.

SUMMARY

Each of these guys have 3 things in common: 

(1) They were college draftees

(2) They were high draft picks

(3) They have flamed out or stalled in the middle minors, some even in A ball, something that shouldn't happen to college-polished high draft picks.  

There is time for each of these guys to reach the potential exemplified by their draft slot and tools.  But this is the year where they need to make that happen.  Guys with these pedigrees just don't flame out before they get to AA or AAA.  They just don't, at least not in an organization like Cleveland where their lifeblood is generating major leaguers from their player development system.

These are the kind of guys who can make a minor league system successful or, if they all fail, can make our system much thinner than it should be, given that we don't spend money bringing in veterans in trades (of prospects) or free agency.

The time is now.  No one should sleep on the importance of these guys having successful years.  I know I will be rooting hard for their success.  Besides being important to them it is INCREDIBLY important to the Guardians that they are successful.