Sunday, June 30, 2024

How To Keep This Rolling - Part 2 - Time For Some Trades - But Who Do We Trade?

If we make a trade at the deadline one of the most important things to do is first identify the assets you will and won't trade.  So here are my thoughts:

TRADEABLE

Guys You Build A Trade Around

1. Kyle Manzardo - Love his skill set but we have Josh Naylor, making Manzo expendable
2. Jose Tena - An above average hitting LHH SS, he is going to have a lot of value
3. Ralphy Velasquez - For a team making a long-term play in a trade, he is the guy.

Part of A Big Trade

4. Gabriel Arias - Maybe a stretch by SS with his power and arm don't grow on trees.
5. George Valera - Depressed value now but a great trade chip as the top secondary part of a deal
6. Parker Messick - A hot SP right now, he is close to ML ready.
7. Joey Cantillo - Like Messick, a close to ML ready SP.
8. Angel Genao - A longer term play, we look at him as excess MIF depth.  Other teams may see him as the crown jewel of their MIF prospects
9. Any other top 30 prospect in our farm systems not listed above or below.

The Icing On The Deal

10. Andrew Walters - Despite his hiccup at AAA, he is a close to ML ready leverage reliever controllab
11. Jonathon Rodriguez - A plug and play guy who could make a trade pay dividends right away for some team.
11. Khalil Watson - More than a throw-in but less than a central figure in a trade, he could just tip the scales to get a deal done.
12. Alex Mooney - Ditto to Watson
13. Jacob Bresnahan - A hot commodity in rookie ball right now, he might be another guy who tips the scales on a deal.
14. Jhonkensy Noel 
15. Any one of Ryan Webb, Doug Nikhazy, Will Dion, Tommy Mace or Matt Wilkinson (once one is traded I want to keep the rest)
16. Any other player in our farm system not listed above or below.
17. Any player on our ML roster or IL not listed below.


UNTRADEABLE

1. Angel Martinez - I would obviously be willing to trade any LHH or RHH middle infield prospects we have.  But I want to keep switch hitting, good hitting, versatile players who are close to the majors
2. Juan Brito - See Martinez
3. Chase DeLauter - Damaged goods, he couldn't be the center of any deal and, therefore, I don't see how including him is something either the Guardians (as a throw-in) or another team (as a main part of a deal) would want to do.
4. Jaison Chourio - No more Junior Caminero moves, please.
5. Daniel Espino - see DeLauter.
6, George Valera - See DeLauter
7. CJ Kayfus - Normally he would be a main part of a deal, especially since he is positionally and handedness redundant as a LHH 1B.  Plus he has so much buzz around him right now.  If he could be in the list of guys you build a deal around, I would trade him.  However, I see teams valuing him only as a secondary part of a deal and I think we would be sellng him way short at this early time by trading him.
8. The following players on our ML roster: Bibee, Williams, Jose, the Naylors, Fry, Gimenez, Schneeman, Kwan, Clase, Cade Smith, Gaddis, Lively, Herrin, Hentges.

So, knowing what we have to work with in a trade, now I go looking for trades at the deadline in Part 3

Saturday, June 29, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 20 - Summary of Posts So Far

 OK, I thought it would be a good time to put, in one place, links to all the blog posts I have made so far as we lead up to the 2024 draft beginning in a little over 2 weeks. So, if you are interested, please feel free to browse.  Note that as you go through these, one thread appears throughout: Don't think you are smarter than the system and just make solid picks with a swinkle of aggression and you can wind up with a great draft!  I encourage you to read through these posts for, possibly, a totally different vision of the baseball draft and how it has and should impact the Guardians and their 2024 draft.  Enjoy!

So here goes:

Part 19: Explores types of players who might be value picks in the draft (other than the typical college junior/HS senior groups)


Part 18 - Talks about how draft-eligible guys performed/are performing in the Cape Cod League, a league where performance seems to be a big factor in how the Guardians rate their college draft prospects.


Part 17 - Warns of the Risks of taking the unusual path of drafting a lower-ranked prospect at 1-1, trying to save money for later rounds.


Part 16 - My first total mock draft of who the Guardians might pick in all 20 rounds of the draft if the draft had been held on June 9th.


Part 15 - A look back at the strategy and results from the Guardians' 2021 draft and the lessons we learned from picking a LOGICAL strategy and executing it.


Part 14 - Looks, from the beginning of the draft, at the history the exact draft slots in rounds 7-10 of the 2024 draft that the Guardians will be drafting.


Part 14 (#2) - Looks at the history of the draft slots in rounds 4, 5 and 6 that Cleveland will pick at in the 2024 Draft


Part 13 -  Following superstition, there was no part 13 and, no, I don't step on the baselines when I leave a baseball/softball field

Part 12 - A history of the draft slots for our Comp A, 2nd and 3rd round picks the Guardians will be picking at in the 2024 draft


Part 11 - Looks at EXACTLY how much money the Guardians have in their draft budget for the 2024 draft, including the 4.99% overage and what that means in terms of penalties.


Part 10 - A look at some players in the category of draft-eligible sophomores and what that term means (NOTE: This is not a very comprehensive list.  Those lists are available as paid content on a few other websites but I neither want to poach this material for this blog nor do I want to pay for content as my blog is always free and it goes against that concept).


Part 9 - A look at how many DH, C, 1B, 2B, SS, 3B were drafted in the first 10 picks of the last 10 drafts.



Part 8 - A look at the trend in pitchers drafted in the top 10 picks of the last 10 drafts


Part 7 - A look at trends in outfielders drafted in the first 10 picks of the last 10 drafts


Part 6 - Early mock draft for players drafted beyond 1-1


Part 5 - A cautionary tale about what happens when you draft safe, draft off a primary position and draft injured players trying to out-think the experts with your 1-1 draft.


Part 4 - This part describes how mistakes in the draft and mistakes in other player decision, including mistakes based on people thinking they are smarter than all the other draft people in baseball, impact drafts and moves a team makes going forward.  Really, this is a cautionary tale that says: DON'T SCREW UP THE 2024 DRAFT!!!


Part 3 - A very early look in January at potential players who might go 1-1.  Looking at this will tell you how things can change in the draft during the year of that draft.


Part 2 - This article warms of how teams sometimes gravitate at the last minute to guys who move up draft boards and how there is value in guys who, at the last minute, suddenly move down draft boards, admonishing the Guardians' draft guys away from over-valuing 'the shiny new thing'.


Part 1 - Written after the draft lottery, this article looks at the data which says that, if they do their jobs correctly, the Guardians are looking at getting multiple great players in this draft.


If you have read this far, thanks!  Go Guardians!

Friday, June 28, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 19 - The Undiscovered Country - Unusual Places To Get Good Players In The Draft

 Around this time of year, casual draft fans are likely thinking about first round picks, multi-tool college juniors and high school senior studs.

However, for those who are draft geeks, the draft is much more nuanced than that with the following additional groups:  
  • Injured college players - Chase DeLauter, Zach Plesac and others are good examples of how investing in an injured player who has fallen in the draft due to his injury is a good thing to do.  Get talent at a discount.  This is especially true for college pitchers who may fall off of teams' radars if they don't pitch in a season or in most of a season due to injury.  Teams may not follow up on a guy, thinking he may just be going back to college.  So, in some instances, a good scout can get a player to sign who wasn't even thinking about that after his injury.
  • Draft-eligible college sophomores - In the past this group was limited to red-shirt sophomores or, in rare cases, double-red-shirt freshmen.  Basically, guys who were 21 or older, had been in college for 3 years but who used up less years of eligibility than that.  The new CBA changed that and included sophomores, even legitimate, non-redshirted sophomores who turn 21 within a few weeks after the draft (August 1st is the deadline now, I think).  This includes guys who enroll in college at age 19 and, therefore, reach 21 years old after only 2 real years in college. The downside of this group, as Alex Mooney showed last year, is that they have EXTREME leverage over the team that drafts them.  That's because, as sophomores, they can just go back to school if they don't get the bonus they want and still be draft-eligible two more times before they use up their college eligibility.   Therefore, after high school pitchers, this is the most risky group to pick from, in terms of being able to sign them to a reasonable bonus.   The better ones almost always sign for way over slot and, in some cases, change their minds AFTER they are drafted and ask for more money which can severely hamstring your draft budget.
  • College seniors - These are guys who have exhausted their college eligibility.  They have very little leverage but are generally selected by teams in the first 10 rounds to save money (signing for $1-10 K) or selected on the 3rd day of the draft for depth prospects (generally signing for $1K).
  • Red-shirt college juniors - These guys are, by age, really college seniors but by eligibility they still have one year left before exhausting their college eligibility. This gives them a little more leverage than college seniors if a team tries to lowball them, but these guys are generally signable for slot money or a little higher.
  • Draft-eligible college players in the transfer portal - To me, this IS part of the undiscovered country of the draft.  It used to be that college transfers had to sit a year before they could play.  With the new transfer portal rules, they are almost always eligible to play at their new college the next year.  The point here is that a player who wants to transfer is, for some reason, not satisfied with their current college.  Maybe the coaches who recruited them have left.  Maybe they weren't getting playing time.  Maybe they weren't as visible to scouts because they played at smaller colleges.  And, most recently, maybe they weren't able to get much NIL money at their former college.  But there's always a reason.  ML teams may be able to leverage that, trading the certainty of bonus money for the uncertainty of a new college.   Some players in the portal aren't draft-eligible yet because they are true freshman or sophomores.  But the ones who are eligible?  Well, that may represent a place where you can get a college player to sign who would normally just go back to school.  Chase Burns was a transfer portal guy, so there is ML talent in the portal, if a player is draft-eligible and a ML team is looking!
  • Re-classified high school seniors -  Some HS juniors who have enough credits to graduate HS decide they want to get their college careers started and, therefore, graduate early, reclassifying themselves as de facto HS seniors.  As scouts and teams tend to focus on the draft-eligible guys that year, a player who re-classifies himself may slide under the radar and teams may not draft him because, well, they just don't know enough about him.  Smart teams should be looking for these re-classified guys as they could represent more undiscovered country in draft-eligible players.
  • Draft-and-follow college players - Back in the day, as us old people say, when there were 40 or 60 or more rounds in the draft, you just couldn't find enough quality prospects to draft.  During that period teams would hedge their bets and draft a guy who was going to junior college or who was a junior college freshman who was going back to their school.   Instead of signing those players within the normal signing period, they were allowed to sign those players all they way up to the next draft.  While that practice was discontinued a few years ago, the new CBA reinstated it and they also added an interesting caveat.  While a drafted player can be signed for up to $150,000 without it counting against your draft pool, a draft-and-follow player signed the next year can be signed for $225,000 without it counting against that pool.  So the $75,000 additional to play with is the carrot.  But the stick is that, if a player doesn't sign the following year you have lost that player.  It would sting a little more to not sign 1 player in your 20 round draft compared to not signing 1 player in a 60 round draft as happened, wait for it....in the old days.

So, there are some more things that I hope the Guardians draft staff are thinking about as they look for talent.  Overlaying those things are the performances of players in the Cape Cod Summer League that I covered in Part 18 of this series as well as organizational strategy, such as the Guardians (and Dodgers and Reds) drafting a bunch of college pitchers in 2021 and the Guardians drafting a bunch of LH slap hitters with good strike zone judgement in 2022 and 2023.  

When you are a small market team you should ALWAYS be looking for the undiscovered country.  Let's hope the Guardians find some again this year and that that helps them to strike it rich in the 2024 draft. 

Thursday, June 27, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 18 - How YOU Doin'? News From The Cape Cod League

 If you follow the Guardians' drafts closely you'll know that they really love guys who perform well in the Cape Cod Summer League.

Look at some of their recent draft picks who were drafted higher than they were ranked:

  • Franco Aleman - One of our top relief prospects, in 2019 he had a 1.16 ERA with 25 H,  2 BB and 27 K in 31 IP on the Cape.  Even though he followed that up with a 5.74 ERA and 75 H in 69 IP at Florida, the Guardians drafted him in the 10th round of the 2021 draft.   Even though it took him a couple of years to settle into pro ball, the CGFS4CP (Cleveland Guardians Finishing School For College Pitchers) developed him into a lights out reliever.
  • CJ Kayfus - In 2021 Kayfus hit .302 on the Cape with an OPS of .742.  The next year he did have an OPS in college (Miami, FL) but still was only ranked 151st in the country, due, primarily, to lower than expected power from a first base prospect. The Guardians thought enough of him to draft him with the 93rd pick and the rest, as they say, is history.
  • Cooper Ingle - While Ingle did not have GREAT success in the CCBL in the summer of 2022, he held his own, hitting .253 with 30 BB in 153 PA, leading to a .401 OBP and a .721 OPS.  He followed that up with a good-but-not-great season at Clemson (.328 BA, .417 OBP, .461 SLG with 6 HR in 256 ABs), leading the Guardians to overdraft the 232nd ranked prospect with the 125th pick in the 2023 draft.  
  • Nate Furman - Furman was not even rated in the top 250 prospects by MLB Pipeline after his 2022 college season but, before the draft, played on the Cape that summer.  He parlayed a .387 OBP and .755 OPS (even though he showed little power with a .306 BA and .367 SLG) into being a 4th round pick (#121 overall) of the Guardians that year.
These are just a few of MANY examples as the Guardians have continued to value performance in the Cape at a much higher level than performance in college, although they DO apparently look at college performance to make sure Cape performance was not an aberration. 

So, with that in mind, let's take a look at the 2024 and 2023 Cape performances of selected 2024 draft-eligible players.  Remember that many 2024 draft prospect rankings are based heavily on what the kids did in the summer of 2023 and the Cape League is where most of the pro scouts spend a lot of time in the summer.  As the draft tends to be what have you done for me lately, there is probably a good deal of weight placed on what guys are doing in the Cape this year.

2024 - (NOTE: Not a complete list at all.  Other prospects may be playing in the Cape that the Guardians will consider, especially in the end of the 2nd day and in the 3rd day of the draft)
  • John Bay - Played college ball this year at Austin Peay, my 9th round pick by the Guardians in my June mock draft for the Guardians, Bay has 3 HRs and a 1.222 OPS buoyed by 3 HR in 23 AB and a .483 OBP with only 1 BB but with 5 HBP so far in the Cape in 2024.
  • Austin Overn - Identified by me in an earlier post as one of the draft-eligible sophomores to watch in this year's draft, Overn is tearing up the Cape right now.  While he underperformed this year at USC, only hitting .270 with a mediocre .349 OBP, he is mashing on the Cape so far with a .361 BA, an .395 OBP and a .667 SLG for an OPS of 1.061 with 3 steals (after stealing 17 in the spring.  Given that they drafted Furman and Joe Lampe in the past, Overn, as a LH batter, fits their OFer profile.  The only thing that may hold him back from being drafted is that he might require a bonus that is much larger than his skill set because of his leverage as a sophomore.
  • Wallace Clark - 22 yr old RS Junior third baseman who played at Duke this year, he has a .385 BA and a .546 OBP at the Cape this year with 8 BB and 7 K in 33 PA.  
  • Mike Sirota - Interestingly, Sirota played on the Cape in 2021, 2022 and 2023.  He is not listed on a 2024 roster.  I can't find any mention on the web of him being injured so it is interesting, in his draft year, that a kid from the Northeast should suddenly decide not to play ball in the league that had become his summer home.   Note that he did participate in the draft combine but except for a fast 60 yard time, this CFer did not appear on many standout lists after the combine. Nonetheless, Sirota has had good seasons on the Cape in past years so this should not deter teams from picking him.  I had him as the CB-A pick for the Guardians at #36 in my mock draft.
  • Connor Wietgrefe - A 22-year old LHP from Minnesota, he currently has allowed 1 R in 11 IP with 1 BB and 12 K on the Cape.  He's a Cleveland-type pitcher who allowed only 1 HR and 26 BB to go with 74 K at Minnesota this spring in 76 IP (85 hits allowed)..   
2023 - (NOTE: This list only looks at players who are not currently ranked highly who had good summers in the Cape in 2023 but had bad springs or were injured during their 2024 college season.  Players who are ranked highly are not in this list but, obviously, the Guardians could and likely WILL use their 2023 Cape performance as a separator between 2 or more guys they are considering).
  • Camron Hill - LHP - Hill was not good this spring and is starting off badly at the Cape this year but last year he was lights out in his time at the Cape. 
  • Derek Clark - LHP - Did well in the Cape last year and followed it up with a good year after transferring to West Virginia.  He could be a good senior sign because he ate a lot of innings this year, with 97.2 IP
  • Daniel Avita - RHP - Was 2nd in ERA on the Cape and followed that up with a junior year in college that was mediocre.  He is a Cleveland pitcher, however, as his 6.17 ERA is balanced somewhat by 45 K and only 9 BB in 35 IP (40 H).  He is 6'6"
  • Hayden Frank - LHP - He had a good year in the Cape, finishing 5th in ERA.  He was out much of his junior year in college but is back pitching well at the Cape in 2024 with 7 IP, 4 H, 1 R, 1 BB and 12K.  Again, another Cleveland pitcher, at 6'6"
  • Smith Pinson - RHP - He is 6'8" and, after performing well on the Cape in 2023, did not follow that up with a good performance this spring.  
  • Finnegan Wall - RHP - Wall missed his junior year after having a great 2023 in the Cape.  He is a possibility as an injured college pitcher that the Guardians like to draft. 
  • Cam Schuelke - RHP - He was the top reliever on the Cape last year but was only a middle reliever at Mississippi State in 2024. He is back on the Cape this summer so maybe he can show them enough to get drafted.  At 6'0", however, he will likely be going back to school if he doesn't sign as an undrafted FA.
  • Matt Hallbach - 1B/3B/LF - He hit well in the Cape last summer but missed a good part of the spring, hitting .409 in 19 games with an OPS of 1.143.  
There are literally hundreds of guys spread between 2023 and 2024 who played on the Cape to varying degrees of success.  The lists above are designed to show you that, if the Guardians tend to really value Cape performance, there will be lots of guys to choose from in the draft this July.

Oh, BTW, Travis Bazzana was the #1 hitter in the Cape last year and a number of top draft prospects this year dotted the top 10 in hitters.  Some of those guys will be around at #36 and #48 but most will be gone before then as their springs have matched or exceeded their Cape performance.









Wednesday, June 26, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 17 - So You Think You Are Smarter Than Everyone Else?

 Lots of rumors about what the Guardians will do.  Most of them center around them taking a lower ranked prospect who they will work out a pre-draft deal with to give them extra resources to use for a lower round pick.  

HISTORICAL DATA

Let's examine recent drafts to what teams have done at 1-1, using their MLB Pipeline ranking at draft time.

2023 - Pittsburgh drafted the #1 ranked prospect, Paul Skenes.  They signed him for $9.2 MM, saving $520,000 from that slot's bonus.  They combined that savings with savings from their 2nd round pick to go $700,000 over slot for the CB-B picks.  An interesting point is that the 1-11 pick was Nolan Schanuel, who was rated 38th.

2022 - Baltimore drafted the #2 prospect, Jackson Holliday, saving $660,000 under slot.  Notably, Arizona took the #1 prospect at 1-2, signing Druw Jones for the identical bonus that Holliday received which, to me, means they liked Holliday better for the same money.  It does not appear they used that savings elsewhere in the draft, only going over slot by $300,000 on their 11th round pick, a significant portion of that coming from going under slot on a number of other picks.  An interesting point from this draft is Kumar Rocker, the #38 prospect was drafted 3rd.

2021 - Pittsburgh drafted Henry Davis, the #5 prospect, for a $1.88 MM savings under slot.   They used all that savings to draft Bubba Chandler at 72 (21st ranked prospect) in the 3rd round for $2.13 MM over slot. The #1 ranked prospect in that draft was Marcelo Mayer, who signed for just $120,000 more than Davis at 1-4.   Overall in baseball, Mayer is the #10 ranked prospect and Chandler is ranked 63rd.

2020 - We are skipping over this due to COVID impacting scouting and how players might have changed rankings during the spring before the draft as they often do.

2019 - Adley Rutschman, the #1 ranked prospect went 1-1 and Bobby Witt, Jr., the #2 ranked prospect went 1-2.  Rutschman went $320,000 under slot and Baltimore used all that (and more) to sign Gunnar Henderson at #42 (27th ranked prospect)

That's as far as I went back because that's as far as MLB Pipeline went back. 

DISCUSSION

There are probably only two reasons to draft someone not rated #1 (or #2) at 1-1.
  • The player is not worth what the slot bonus and the player will not settle for a lower bonus more in line with their skills
  • The team at 1-1 wants to save money and feels taking a lesser player will still give them a good player plus another prospect who they would have to sign for over slot.
Looking at the 4 draft years above, each year the team drafting 1-1 who drafted either the best or 2nd best prospect in the draft, got a really good player who signed for under slot EXCEPT for Pittsburgh, who got an OK player and saved a lot of money, allowing them to get another OK prospect.

The problems that I have with Pittsburgh approach in 2021 are:
  • A team has its pick of all the players at 1-1, meaning they are almost guaranteed to get a stud player as the drafts of 2019, 2022, 2023 (and 2021, if Mayer had been selected at 1-1).  They likely would have to dip down to the 5th best prospect or below as Pittsburgh did to save enough money to position themselves to get a much more valuable prospect lower in the draft than they would have normally been able to afford.
  • It makes no sense to just say you are going to use these savings in lower rounds.  You have to have an idea of the 1-2 players you would target with those savings and you have no idea if the guy(s) you are targeting to use these 1-1 savings on will even be there when it's time for you to draft.  
  • If you choose the argument that highly ranked players are available all through the draft, then consider this. There are reasons why guys drop in the draft and to say that you are going to draft a highly rated guy who dropped belies the circumstances about why he dropped AND the reasons why 29 other teams haven't drafted THAT guy up to THAT point in the draft.
MY OPINION

So therein lies the problem I have with drafting someone other than the #1 or #2 rated prospect.  You don't know if the savings you make on the 1-1 pick will even be useful to you later.  And, if they are useful,  whether you will end up with the same value as if you had just picked the #1 or #2 prospect at 1-1 and use the lesser, but significant savings under slot, to draft guys to over slot bonuses later.

It comes down to this: You have to think that you are the smartest person in the draft if you think you can outmaneuver 29 other teams to get the EXACT outcome, or even close to that outcome, you want.  

To be clear:

YOU HAVE TO THINK YOU ARE THE SMARTEST GUY IN THE ROOM. 

Now, if you are drafting at the end of the 1st round where the Yankees draft, trying this approach with, say Anthony Volpe, makes sense. But if you are drafting 1-1 you don't have to guess.  Just pick the best player available and if you want a second determiner, take the top 2 guys and pick the one who will sign for lesss money.

There is no logic that says that you go with a lesser talent.

You can claim the Guardians outsmarted teams in 2021 by taking almost all pitchers but the Dodgers and Reds did almost the exact thing that year.

You can claim that the Guardians outsmarted everyone else by taking Kayfus and all the rest of the slap hitters from the 2023 draft instead of higher ranked prospects but clearly the strategy, except for Kayfus, has not worked out yet.  And the argument can clearly be made that most of the prospects they drafted after Clemmey would have been there 1-3 rounds later. 

But they thought they were smarter than anyone else in baseball but look if they had just been logical and methodical.  We would have Waldrep instead of Velaxquez and, if we look 2 years from now, I am pretty sure we could have easily had talents better than Ingle, Knapczyk and Hawke and probably even better than Walters (e.g., drafting a starting pitcher) and STILL have gotten 2 or all 3 of those guys later in the draft.  

So my advice to the Guardians draft team: Do the logical thing.  Don't think you are going to outsmart the system or show you are the smartest guy in the room.  The MLB draft is littered with guys who had that thought and ended up burning their teams with high draft picks or even entire drafts that crashed and burned with little return. 

Again: DON'T THINK YOU ARE THE SMARTEST GUYS IN THE ROOM.  JUST DO YOUR FREAKIN' JOBS.

If you want to screw with your draft at the end of day 2 or on day 3, be my guest.  Just leave the first 7 rounds for guys who make sense rather than guys who you think will surprise the world.

We are Cleveland.  We don't have money to offset any mistakes you make.


Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Guardians Top Prospect List - Mid-Season Prospect Rankings

 OK, all of the full-season teams have completed their first half and the DSL and ACL teams are well into their seasons.  So it's time to look at our prospects and how their ranking have changed based on their production so far this season.  I have not included guys like Cade Smith (16) because I am sure that he will exceed his rookie status this season.  Ditto for Daniel Schneeman (34).  

So, here goes (ranking of where I had them at the beginning of the season is in parentheses).

1. Chase DeLauter (1)
2. Jaison Chourio (2)
3. Jose Tena (7)
4. Angel Martinez (5)
5. Juan Brito (3)
6. Kyle Manzardo (4)
7. CJ Kayfus (33)
8. Alex Clemmey (6)
9. Joey Cantillo (8)
10. Andrew Walters (9)
11. Ralphy Velazquez (11)
12. George Valera (13)
13. Jonathon Rodriguez (19)
14. Angel Genao (14)
15. Alex Mooney (42)
16. Welbyn Francisca (10)
17. Jhonkensy Noel (20)
18. Khalil Watson (15)
19. Ryan Webb (17)
20. Robert Arias (18)
21. Petey Halpin (19)
22. Daniel Espino (12)
23. Jackson Humphries (27)
25. Franco Aleman (29)
26. Matt Wilkinson (99)
27. Doug Nikhazy (32)
28. Lenny Torres, Jr. (31)
29. Will Dion (22)
30. Tommy Mace (64)
31. Aaron Davenport (70)
32. Parker Messick (36)
33. Dayan Frias (23)
34. Ethan Hankins (28)
35. Tanner Burns (30)
36. Rafael Ramirez Jr. (21)
37. Justin Campbell (35)
38. Cooper Ingle (37)
39. Jose Devers (38)
40. Jake Fox (26)
41. Jacob Zibin (24)
42. Trenton Denholm (93)
43. Jacob Bresnahan (114)
44. Wuilfredo Antunez (39)
45. Joe Lampe (50)
46. Robert Lopez (40)
47. Brayan Lavastida (41)
48. Ross Carver (43)
49. Nick Mikolajczak (44)
50. Alexfri Planez (49)
51. Esteban Gonzalez (98)
52. Austin Peterson (149)
53. Maick Collado (92)
54.  Guy Lipscomb (114)
55. Jack Leftwich (47)
56. Juan Benjamin (52)
57. Davis Sharpe (53)
58. Nate Furman (54)
59. Milan Tolentino (55)
60. Magnus Ellerts (69)
61. Kody Huff (72)
62. Tyler Thornton (56)
63. Trey Benton (57)
64. Micah Pries (58)
65. Jose Cedeno (61)
66. Andrew Misiaszek (62)
67. Gabriel Rodriguez the elder (63)
68. Victor Izturis (66)
69. Dylan DeLucia (67)
70. Jay Driver (121)
71. Hunter Stanley (68)
72. Yorman Gomez (73)
73. Alonzo Richardson (74)
74. Jorge Burgos (101)
75. Gabriel Rodriguez the younger (76)
76. Christian Cairo (89)
77. Manuel Mejias (78)
78. Jose Pirela (45)
79. Yerlin Luis (46)
80. Mason Hickman (134)
81. Bradley Hanner (79)
82. Randy Labaut (80)
83. Keegan Zinn (100)
84. Christian Knapczyk (81)
85. Alaska Abney (82)
86. Nic Enright (88)
87. Javier Santos (102)
88. Luis Durango Jr. (103)
89. Evilio Hernandez (104)
90. Melkis Hernandez (105)
91. Kendeglys Virquez (NR)
92. Tyrese Turner (151)
93. Jonah Advincula (123)
94. Jordan Jones (106)
95. Adam Tulloch (107)
96. Edelvis Perez (108)
97.  Austin Aldeano (109)
98. Rodney Boone (148)
99. Jake Miller (110)
100. Fran Alduey (111)
101. Tommy Hawke (112)
102. Jose Pastrano (131)
103. Micael Ramirez (135)
104. Yordys Valdez (142)
105. Johny Tincher (143)
106. Raynel Delgado (59)
107. Aaron Bracho (60)

Monday, June 24, 2024

Thoughts for Monday, 6-24-24

 (1) The Guardians are in 1st place and, up to this point, they have won almost every game they should have this year (except the first 3 in the White Sox series).  They have come back from every losing streak with a winning streak.  They have done it on guts, they have done it on grit, they have done it on skill, they have done on on esprit-de-corps.   The 49-26 record is well-earned and well-deserved.

(2) Except for a couple of instances, almost every lineup, almost every move Vogt has made is very logical and well-thought out.  Love Francona but his managing seemed to be based on his gut and his desire that his players succeeded rather than percentages.  Even McCaughan yesterday.  While I hated the move at the time it was clearly the way to go as Avila had been used up recently and McCaughan saved us from having to use 2 relievers if the game is close late as Clase is (or at least should be) kept down for the next 2 games.  If Morgan is ready, McCaughan should be DFA'd and Eli called up as McCaughan would be cooked for the next 2 games anyway. 

(3)  Our veterans seem to be following the season-long plan of impacting the ball.  It is obvious, however, that guys like Rocchio, JRod, Arias and even Manzardo have not gotten the memo.  JRod has been especially passive and Manzardo, even though he had 10 doubles, appeared passive to me, as well.   Let's hope this is a learned trait and these guys need to learn it FAST.  Even Schneeman appeared passive at times although it is hard with him to argue that he is not impacting the ball.   

(4) I hope Fry is OK but if he isn't, we need Noel to get a shot right now, especially against the lefties we are going to be hitting against.  And when Noel comes up tell him 2 things: don't chase the slider low and away and, for every other pitch, impact the ball.

(5) People are starting to think about the trade deadline but a couple of points I want to make:
    
    (a) Most trade deadline deals don't work out for the buyer
    (b) The only good trade this FO has made in 4 years is for Fry...and there have been some disasters.
    (c) When we were pursuing Sean Murphy 2 years ago, the A's wanted Williams, Espino, Martinez and one other prospect.  They settled for second rate prospects from Atlanta when they couldn't con us into giving up top prospects.  My point is that it appears that teams only want to trade with us if they think they can rob us...and they always think they can rob us.
    (d) The key to the trade deadline should not be if we can catch up to the Yankees and Orioles where they are now but, rather, can we do enough to catch up to them AFTER what they will spend at the trade deadline as both teams will likely be more active than we will be.
    (e) Finally, our farm system is only middle of the pack in terms of talent.  We may have to overpay in volume of talent to get even incremental help.  

I have a novel idea: wait out the trade deadline.  Imagine if we could have gotten Giolito, Moore and Lopez for peanuts in August THIS year!   Maybe last year was a one-off on that kind of move...or maybe not.

(6) Tough, tough stretch coming up for the Guardians.  Winning 1 of 3 in Baltimore is needed and splitting in Kansas City is all it takes for me to be happy, however.  I know that is only 3-4 on this road trip but goals when you are 7 games up can be a little more muted than if you are a half game up.  

(7) The draft is almost here.  I will have more content in the next couple of weeks but the key for me is what I have been saying all along: The Guardians draft director and draft team can only screw this up in one way: IF THEY ACT LIKE THEY ARE THE SMARTEST GUYS IN THE ROOM.  Don't be cute, don't do anything weird (like last year when you picked Velasquez over Waldrep) or in 2023 where you picked a bunch of LH slap hitters (which is likely reinforced in their draft room given the success of Kwan and Kayfus).  Just solid draft picks like you made in 2021 with the exception that you start with college position players and switch over to college pitchers in the 2nd round.  Except for taking late round flyers on HS pitchers, avoid HS players.  The pitching pipeline needs to be filled up in the upper half of the minors and stacked at the bottom with US HS pitchers and Cuban youngsters and we have bet a lot of money on filling up the bottom of the hitter pipeline with international signees.  Again, don't try to save money for guys who might not even be there when you draft.  Don't be cute.  Just be solid and the rest will take care of itself.

Go Guards!


Thursday, June 13, 2024

How To Keep This Rolling - Part 1 -Time For Some Changes

Yep, things look great right now for the Guardians.  For the guy who predicted they would go 61-101, I am getting ready to catch the wrath of Guardians fans.

But we need to remember how I got to that prediction. 
  • Bet that Ramon Laureano was the pre-PED suspension guy (he wasn't)
  • Bet that Cal Quantrill was not as good as his results showed he was (they were wrong)
  • Bet that Scott Barlow was going to be a good setup man and backup closer (he wasn't)
  • Bet that Estevan Florial was more than the AAAA prospect he looked like up to this season (he wasn't)
  • Bet that their internal pitching options didn't require them to add SP this off-season (they came up short)
Lots of things went right for the Guardians this year, giving them a solid CFer, best bullpen in baseball, and a rotation of five guys with, essentially, no backups, stayed together long enough to get them to this point.  Finally, we have had the advantage of playing good teams when they were playing badly and having Vogt push almost every right button.

But we should not be deluded into thinking that 43-23 is who this team is right now.  We need to keep getting better and, if guys continue to struggle they should be moved off the active roster and replaced by other guys deserving of a chance.

Here are some things we should do by tomorrow and why:

1. Send Gabriel Arias to AAA - Arias does a great impersonation of Oscar Mercado.  Every time we think he has buried himself, Arias hits a HR or makes a great defensive play.  But he needs to be sent out.  His body of work over 2 years and how his performance has degraded through this season, on both sides of the ball, tell even the most casual Guardians' fan that he is not helping this team.  Plus, with the addition of LHH Daniel Schneeman, the Guardians have two guys who can play SS, not counting Andres Gimenez.  Arias is not helping this team.  Send him to Columbus for more polishing.

2. Send Will Brennan to AAA - Before 2022, his entire body of work screamed that he was a 4th OFer, at best.   Then the 100 RBI year at Columbus happened followed by a successful cup of coffee in Cleveland.  But the underlying stats said he was likely a 4th outfielder.  He has now had about a season and a half to show that he was more than a 4th outfielder and he hasn't done it.  Not even to the level that he is worth the roster spot as a platoon player.  He needs to be sent to Columbus to give him time to re-prove himself.

3, Bring up Jonathon Rodriguez - Yes, Rodriguez had his shot and, unlike Schneeman, didn't grab it and run with up, looking more like Oscar Gonzalez at his worst instead of Oscar Gonzalez at this best.  But, to JRod's credit, he went down to Columbus and has been raking.  In the 1-1 swap of Brennan for Rodriguez, we have a net zero change in RFers.  JRod was sent out on June 2nd so he would be eligible to be recalled tomorrow.

4. Bring up Jhonkensy Noel - Noel is no Arias on defense but he doesn't need to be. We have Rocchio and Schneeman to play SS and Tena only a phone call away, not to mention having Angel Martnez and Juan Brito at AAA.  What Noel brings is the ability to play 1B, LF and RF at a passable level and even 3B in an emergency.  Plus, he makes the perfect DH platoon with Manzardo and good insurance if Manzardo or Josh Naylor get injured.   Noel has so much potential, offensively, and he is very hot at AAA right now so now is a good time to call him up.   He deserves a chance and this team needs a 2022 Oscar Gonzalez-like spark right now.

If we do these two things we:
  • Balanced the position player roster better.  Counting switch hitters in both groups we would have:
    • 8 LH batters (Ramirez, Rocchio, Josh and Bo Naylor, Schneeman, Gimenez, Kwan, Manzardo)
    • 7 RH batters (Ramirez, Rocchio, Fry, Freeman, JRod, Noel, Hedges) 
  • Stayed the same, essentially, versatility-wise
    • Catcher (BNaylor, Hedges, Fry)
    • First base (JNaylor, Manzardo, Noel, Fry)
    • Second base (Gimenez, Schneeman, Freeman)
    • Shortstop (Rocchio, Schneeman, Gimenez, Freeman)
    • Third base (Ramirez, Fry, Schneeman, Freeman, Noel)
    • Left Field (Kwan, Fry, Noel, Rodriguez, Schneeman)
    • Center Field (Freeman, Schneeman)
    • Right Field (Fry, Noel, Rodriguez)
  • Added the potential for more power (and RH power) and a Schneeman-like spark to our lineup to take the pressure off of Jose, Josh and, especially, Fry.
We have an off-day today.  We have time to make these changes.  JRod and Noel deserve a chance to show themselves.  Maybe they succeed and make themselves viable pieces for the rest of the season or valuable trade chips.  Maybe they fail and go back to the minors for more seasoning.  

These moves make perfect sense and, IMO, they could provide the same kind of spark Schneeman did when he was called up instead of keeping the same underperforming guys (Brennan and Arias) and hoping for an unexpected improvement that hasn't shown up for 1.5 seasons.  With our roster and how the FO has made this whole season a house of cards, that same FO now needs to gamble on our prospects and make these changes.

We have an off day.  Let's use it effectively!  I think this team needs a constant influx of talent, and the next couple of waves before the deadline should be from inside the organization.  

Next time we'll talk about what we can do from outside the organization to help keep the good times going and sustain the good run we are on through the end of the season so we have a better chance to make the playoffs.  

Sunday, June 9, 2024

2024 Draft - Part 16 - It's June 9th. What I Would Do If The Draft Was Tomorrow

OK, let's jump into our time machine and hop forward about 38 days to July 14th and the 2024 first year player draft.   Who would I pick if I was the Guardians?  Obviously the draft is a fluid exercise.  Last year it was widely rumored that the Guardians were going to draft Colten Emerson.  Then, one slot before the Guardians' pick, the Mariners selected Emerson, who is now the 15th best prospect in baseball.  The same thing will happen this year, to be sure, after the 1-1 pick. AND THAT WAS JUST LAST YEAR'S FIRST ROUND PICK. So a lot of what I will say here will depend on players being available.  So let's start this mental exercise.

1-1 - Travis Bazzana - 2B - Oregon St. - Bazzana fits the Guardians model: LHH with great plate discipline, great hit tool, great athleticism and, as a bonus, great work ethic and he should get to the majors fast as a college hitter who could possibly play in the OF but looks to be solid at 2B, too.  I know there are negatives: middle infielder (one of a million in our system), LHH (of which it looks we have thousands in the minors).  Plus, my calculations say that we should be able to save $1+ MM on him. I just hope the Guardians don't try to prove they are the smartest people in the draft in baseball and select someone who is cheaper just to save money.

1-36 (Supplemental A) - Mike Sirota - OF - Northeastern - As I was contemplating this pick I was vacillating. Sirota? College Pitcher? Sirota?  College Pitcher?  In the end, I decided on Sirota because there are many college pitchers available but not as many college hitters like Sirota.  A RHH who can likely stay in CF as a pro.  His combination of speed and strike zone control fits into what the Guardians are looking for and could allow him to develop more power as a pro. Also he has grown up playing in the cold weather so there is that.   I see his floor as Tyler Freeman and his ceiling as Jazz Chisholm with better defense.  Plus, he has done well in two times in the Cape summer league and that is important to the Guardians.

2-48 - Bryce Cunningham, RHP - Vanderbilt -  So, once I picked Sirota it meant I was going to go heavy after college pitching.  The problem with identifying THE college pitcher I want at this slot is that the fluidity of this draft may throw a monkey wrench into my plans. That being said, after the first 10-12 picks this draft will be very fluid so there will be a lot of teams out there chasing the brass ring and, I think, taking gambles on 5-tool players on both sides of the ball.  I think 3 things played into my pick here: (1) while the strength, at this point in the draft, is likely to be high school pitchers and, to a lesser extent, HS position players, the Guardians aren't really very good developing either of those demographic groups; (2) Cunningham has the type of stuff that the Guardians love to build from as he looks very Tanner Bibee-like to me but is not polished, meaning reliever risk could allow him to be available here; (3) In situations where everything else is equal, I think the Guardians pick the high floor, low current ceiling college pitcher as they are more likely to succeed at some level in the majors and they will get there pretty quickly, or at least that's the hope.  I am sure there are other college pitchers who fit in here but Cunningham will not break the bank, fitting in nicely to the Guardians saving money for later rounds.  In addition, he is a 2-time all-star in the Cape summer league and the Guardians love guys who were successful on the Cape.  He should fit well into The Cleveland Guardians Finishing School for College Pitchers (CGFS4CP, previously known as "The Factory") that gave us Shane Beiber, Tanner Bibee and others from Day 2 rounds. 

3-84 - Matt Ager - RHP - UC Santa Barbara - Earlier in the year I thought that Ager might sneak into the top 2 rounds but the way he was used this year, in my opinion, caused his stuff to play down.  I think that we go for him here as the CGFS4CP appears to be alive and well considering the results so far this year with Nikhazy, Mace, Aleman, Davenport and Denholm.  And he's from Santa Barbara (Bieber-land, cough!).

4-113 - Ryan Campos - C - Arizona State - I said I would be all about college pitching, right?  And there are so many tantalizing college pitchers left at this point.  So, normally I would kick myself (or the Guardians) for this pick but Campos fits the Guardians mold for hitters so much (LHH, walks much more than strikes out (40/25)) that I am going to ignore his similarity to 2023 overdraft Cooper Ingle (albeit Campos more power).  Hey, the Guardians gonna love who they're gonna love, right?  So I am biting my lip and taking Campos here as I think they should be able to sign him for a little under slot and, frankly, our organizational depth at catcher SUCKS, especially in the upper minors.

5-146 - Trey Gregory-Alford - RHP - HS, Colorado - Gregory-Alford is really just a placeholder here.  It's his profile that has had me interested since I predicted the Guardians would take him all the way back in January because he had a particular profile. That profile is a HS pitcher who has/had a lot of hype, who has a great college scholarship and who has fallen a little due to an uneven performance in 2024 and, for icing on the cake, he comes from a cold weather area so the looks at him this spring were probably limited and teams would have to go on showcase results with the Guardians liking to look at the performance of a player the previous summer.  The point here is that he, like many HS pitchers, will have an inflated idea of his value and will be a clear over-slot signing.  The Guardians should have the money left over from Bazzana to sign Gregory-Alford (OR SOMEONE LIKE HIM) in this slot and I think they will go for it.  I still project they will go with an above average number of HS pitcher flyers (maybe 4-5) in rounds 11-20 (like Marohn, Zinn and Heuer last year) along with a couple of over-slot college pitchers who have dropped in performance or stuff (e.g. Adam Plutko) or were hurt in 2024 (see Zach Plesac).  But this slot will be where they make their biggest splash, IMO, for Gregory-Alford or another HS pitcher whose performance/bonus demands would likely cause him to fall out of the top 10 rounds or, as has happened many times in the past few years, out of the draft altogether.

6-175 -Bridger Holmes - RHP - Oregon State - Continuing on the Andrew Walters, Nick Sandlin, Franco Aleman vein, I am picking Holmes here as I like him as a reliever and I think he will come cheap.  His delivery looks like Sandlin's which I think will give the Guardians confidence that the CGFS4CP will be able to get the most out of him.  If they have been on Bazzana, they have also gotten plenty of looks at Holmes.  It is questionable whether Holmes will be here but, if he is, I love this pick a lot.

7-205 - Nick Brink - RHP - Portland - Brink is a RS Jr. pick (like a college senior) for us in this draft.   An over-draft here and actually the type of pick I HATE when the Guardians make it, I still like his combination of stuff and the fact that he will come cheap.  He fits with the CGFS4CP as he has good stuff and has pitched enough innings this year (99.2) that it will give them time to work with him over the fall and into the spring so he can be ready for a full-season assignment next spring.

8-235 - Owen Boerema - RHP - Kansas State - Another senior sign, Boerema was a solid pitcher for K-State, logging 98 innings this spring, making him the perfect college pitcher for the Guardian,s CGFS4CP, who like to avoid starting college pitchers' professional careers, if possible, until the spring after their draft year meaning his heavy inning load won't be an issue.  Like Austin Peterson from UConn a couple of years ago, any value from Boerema might be obtained in a maddeningly slow process, at least for the age of a prospect like him.  But I like the risk and the low cost to save money for all the HS pitcher flyers and injured college pitchers I plan to draft in rounds 11-20.

9-265 - John Bay - OF - Austin Peay - Another senior sign (actually a redshirt junior), Bay is my only concession to drafting a college OFer with power.  He hits RH (giving us 2 with Sirota), had an upsurge in power this year, can steal a base and take a walk...and, as a RS JR, should come at slot or a little below.

10-295 - Pierce Coppola - LHP - Florida - This guy reminds me of a hybrid of Aleman and Hentges.  He had a 9.16 ERA in 2024 so, even as a college junior, he should be available here and should sign for slot.  Like Aleman and Tugboat Wilkinson, this guy is a huge project but 6-8 pitchers with injury history and 9+ ERAs tend to be that way, no matter what sort of stuff they have.  But I am counting on the CGFS4CP once again to develop this guy.   Probably will take a little above slot to sign him ($200,000 or so) but I like the gamble.

OK, so there is my draft so far through day 2.  While a number of these guys are highly speculative and there are lots of options for almost all these picks after Bazzana (e.g., think of all the college SP I could have drafted who were rated close to or maybe even higher than Ager), and for all the talk I had early in the year about this being the year of the draft-eligible sophomore, saying that we had the money to mine that pool of guys who likely would be expensive signs (see Alex Mooney from 2023), I didn't pick a single draft-eligible soph!  Maybe the Guardians will have a different approach on these types of guys in the first two days or maybe they will try to draft some of them on day 3.  Who knows.

Now on to day 3 where I plan to focus on 4 types of guys: injured college pitchers, HS pitchers who have dropped, guys who are draft-eligible and in the transfer portal, draft-eligible sophomores and, for the first time for the Guardians, drafting a junior college draft-and-follow guy or two as those guys are allowed to have a higher bonus before they start counting agains the previous year's draft.  I will also throw in one college senior OFer because, well, I just like him.

Round 11 - Matt Koch - RHP - Creighton (in transfer portal) - Koch turns 21 on June 29th, making him both a draft-eligible sophomore and a transfer portal guy.   With a fastball up to 96 and other good analytics, he looks good (60 Ks in 38.1 innings in 2024).  Normally 11th round picks, being the first picks on day 3, after the dust settles on a frantic day 2, are places where teams can pick up gems.  In the 11th and 12 rounds of previous drafts we have picked up guys like Adam Plutko, Zach Plesac and, recently, Magnus Ellerts (2022), Hunter Stanley (2021) and Nick Mikolajchak (2019), all college pitchers.  Obviously Koch will cost us over slot but not so much that we won't have it left in our war chest from savings on picks in the first 10 rounds. 

Round 12 - Nate Knowles - RHP - William & Mary - As the Guardians get into double digits they clearly focus on college pitchers who have reliever capabilities as a pro.  I think Knowles fits this category and, as he is undersized (5'11"), I think he would be available at this pick and be signable.

Round 13 - Micah McDowell - OF - Oregon State - Literally no one must like this guy the way I do.  But I see him as a solid senior signing and I don't necessarily see any of my other day 3 picks being impacted by using a relatively early day 3 slot to pick McDowell.  I mean, look at the stats: .403/.505/.667/1.167.  He has stolen less bases this year but he plays CF and stole 15 last year and 25 the year before in summer ball in only 35 games! As was said about Holmes, the Guardians scouting Bazzana would have gotten plenty of looks at McDowell as, except for a period where he was injured, he hit 2nd in the OSU order, right behind Bazzana.  If we can get him here I say why not?  

Round 14 - Colby Holcombe - RHP - Mississippi State - Another guy, like Coppola with good size and bad stats, Holcombe is a perfect fit for the Guardians.  I think it will cost them a little more money to pry him away from college (probably $200,000) just to show him we are serious and convince him that he is not likely, based on his track record, to do any better if he goes back to college for another year.

Round 15 - Blake Larson - LHP - IMG Academy (FL) - Larson represents a placeholder here but I think he is a good example.  Young kids seem to be more concerned about the round they are drafted in because that round gives them prestige as well as top bonus money.  How many times have I heard "I won't sign unless I get drafted in the first 3 rounds".  The IMG Academy gets good kids there with promise of professional success or, at least, a good college scholarship.  The Guardians have shown the ability to convince HS pitchers that the round doesn't matter, it is the bonus and that it is the bonus that makes the kid a priority prospect, not the round they were drafted in.  This allowed them to land Zibin, Humphries, Zinn, Bresnahan and other HS pitches late in the draft with Heuer and Marohn likely added to that list if Mooney hadn't siphoned off all the extra cash the Guardians had to work with.   

Round 16 - Joseph Broughton - LHP - Northville HS (MI) - Another guy who I think will sign as his college commitment is to Pittsburgh.  I think, like Marohn last year, we just need to find the money to sign him away from Pittsburgh and get him into our minor league development program.  Again, he is just a placeholder but I think if we get HS flyer picks in round 5, 15 and 16 who are quality prospects I think we can use any draft excess we have.  The Guardians may want to add another HS pitcher and we'll talk about that below.

Round 17 - Beau Sampson - RHP - Salt Lake City CC - Sampson is 6-6 and is a freshman, meaning he could go back to junior college in 2025 and still be signable by the Guardians under the new draft rules.  Sampson could be signed between the end of his 2025 JUCO season and day 1 of the 2025 draft.  The upside to this new rule as that the player could be signed for up to $225,000 and not count against Cleveland's bonus pool.  That means that Sampson could be signed for $75,000 more next year and not count against the 2024 bonus pool compared to if he was signed for the same amount during the 2024 signing period, which ends at the end of July, 2024.  The downside is if the Guardians fail to sign him before next year's draft they have, essentially, lost one of their 20 draft picks from 2024 with no chance of getting a ML player out of that slot.  This would be the same for any player drafted in 2024 who did not sign, however.

Round 18 - Jacob Swanson - RHP - Touttle Lake (WA) HS - I think a guy like Swanson could be convinced to start his pro career.  I think you are looking at probably $300,000+ to sign him and, like the other HS pitchers on this list, this spot is just a placeholder for a well-regarded HS pitcher who we can sign using the excess bonus pool money (plus up to 5% greater than the pool) to sign.  

Round 19 - Matt Willadsen - RHP - NC State - Willadsen would have been a senior but was injured this winter and missed the entire season.  He would be a cheap sign and I like what I read about him.

Round 20 - Tyler Boudreau - RHP - Midland CC (TX) -  Boudreau is a draft-eligible junior college player as he is already 21.  I think he is signable.  You could substitute an injured college pitcher here who would have been a higher draft choice, probably one who has been hurt some but not all of the year, meaning that he wouldn't get an extra year of eligibility due to his injury. I can't identify who that would be right now but, if not the lower level draft-eligible sophomore, I think the injured college pitcher route might be the way they would go here.

So, there you have it.  1 college MIFer, 2 RHH college outfielders, 1 LHH college outfielder, 1 LHH college catcher, 1 JUCO pitcher, 11 college pitchers, 4 HS Pitchers (all of which are flyers to some level).  We have 3 draft-eligible sophomores, 1 draft-and-follow, 4 RS Jr/college senior draftees, those 4 HS pitchers and the rest being college juniors. One scenario out of billions.  While it might not be exactly right I think it shows how I would conduct the draft, what mix I would like to have and how I think the Guardians could get to that mix.

Hope you enjoy it as much as I enjoyed putting this together.  Shutting off the time machine now and going to bed.  Good night.  Rest well.  Go Guards!